henhaobio
Sign in

Molecular Ecology ResourcesEcologyPeer-reviewed journal article

Improving whole biodiversity monitoring and discovery with environmental DNA metagenomics

Manuel CurtoiD, Ana VeríssimoiD, Giulia RiccioniiD, Carlos D. SantosiD, Filipe RibeiroiD, Sissel JentoftiD, Maria Judite AlvesiD, Hugo F. GanteiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metagenomics sequences all DNA molecules present in environmental samples and has the potential of identifying virtually any organism from which they are derived. However, due to unacceptable levels of false positives and negatives, this approach is underexplored as a tool for biodiversity monitoring across the tree of life, particularly for non-microscopic eukaryotes. We present SEQIDIST, a framework that combines multilocus BLAST matches against several reference databases followed by analysis of sequence identity distribution patterns to disentangle false positives while revealing new biodiversity and increasing the accuracy of metagenomic approaches. We tested SEQIDIST on an eDNA metagenomic dataset from a riverine site and compare the results to those obtained with an eDNA metabarcoding approach for benchmarking purposes. We start by characterizing the biological community ([~] 2000 taxa) across the tree of life at low taxonomic levels and show that eDNA metagenomics has a higher sensitivity than eDNA metabarcoding in discovering new diversity. We show that limited representation of whole genome sequences in reference databases can lead to false positives. For non-microscopic eukaryotes, eDNA metagenomic data often consist of a few sparse, anonymous sequences scattered across the genome, making metagenome assembly methods unfeasible. Finally, we infer eDNA source and residency time using read length distributions as a measure of decay status. The higher accuracy of SEQIDIST opens the discussion of the archival potential of eDNA metagenomics and its implementation in biodiversity monitoring actions at large planetary and temporal scales.

Citations
13
FWCI
5.98
Field percentile
top 3%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISMacher '26Pipes '24Berkel '26Singer '20Brandt '20Holman '19
70% semantic matchEcology
Till‐Hendrik Macher, Robin Schütz, Jens Arle+8 more·Ecological Indicators·Aug 14, 2026