Sign in
NeurosciencePLoS Computational Biology
Peer-reviewed journal article

An information theoretic method to resolve millisecond-scale spike timing precision in a comprehensive motor program

Joy OrtegaiD, Tobias Niebur, Leo WoodiD, Rachel Conn, Simon SponbergiD

Abstract

Sensory inputs in nervous systems are often encoded at the millisecond scale in a temporally precise code. There is now a growing appreciation for the prevalence of precise timing encoding in motor systems. Animals from moths to birds control motor outputs using precise spike timing, but we largely do not know at what scale timing matters in these circuits due to the difficulty of recording a complete set of spike-resolved motor signals and relatively few methods for assessing spike timing precision. We introduce a method to estimate spike timing precision in motor circuits using continuous MI estimation at increasing levels of added uniform noise. This method can assess spike timing precision at fine scales for encoding rich motor output variation. We demonstrate the advantages of this approach compared to a previously established discrete information theoretic method of assessing spike timing precision. We use this method to analyze a data set of simultaneous turning (yaw) torque output and EMG recordings from the 10 primary muscles of Manduca sexta as tethered moths visually tracked a robotic flower moving with a 1 Hz sinusoidal trajectory. We know that all 10 muscles in this motor program encode the majority of information about yaw torque in spike timings, but we do not know whether individual muscles receive information encoded at different levels of precision. Using the continuous MI method, we demonstrate that the scale of temporal precision in all motor units in this insect flight circuit is at the sub-millisecond or millisecond-scale, with variation in precision scale present between muscle types. This method can be applied broadly to estimate spike timing precision in sensory and motor circuits in both invertebrates and vertebrates.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
13
FWCI
1.79
Field percentile
top 16%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISPutney '19Srivastava '17Nicola '21Ning '22Pang '22Pascual '24
84% semantic matchNeuroscience
Joy Putney, Rachel Conn, Simon Sponberg·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences·Dec 16, 2019· 31 citations