henhaobio
Sign in

GigaScienceMolecular BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article

Patterns of aDNA Damage Through Time and Environments - lessons from herbarium specimens

Stefano PorrelliiD, Alice FornasieroiD, Hong Phuong LeiD, Wenzhe YiniD, María E Navarrete RodrígueziD, Nahed MohammediD, Axel HimmelbachiD, Andrew C. ClarkeiD, Nils SteiniD, Paul Julian KerseyiD, Rod A. WingiD, Rafal Marek GutakeriD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Herbarium collections are a vast but underutilized resource for ancient DNA research, containing over 400 million specimens with detailed metadata and spanning centuries of global biodiversity. Understanding patterns of DNA preservation in natural collections is crucial for optimizing ancient DNA studies and informing future curation practices. We analysed genomic data for 573 herbarium specimens from six plant species from the genera Hordeum and Oryza collected from the Americas and Eurasia over 220 years. Using standardized laboratory protocols and shotgun sequencing, we quantified DNA degradation and elucidated factors that accelerate it. We find significant age-dependent DNA fragmentation rates, indicating temporal degradation processes not detected in prehistoric samples. In our analysis, DNA decay rates in herbarium specimens were almost eight times faster than in moa bones, reflecting fundamental differences in tissue composition and preservation environments. Environmental conditions at the time of specimen collection emerged as the major determinants of post-mortem damage rates, with the interaction term between temperature and genus being the dominant driver of cytosine deamination. We find no effect of sample storage on DNA damage and degradation. These findings provide insights into how climatic origin, preservation environment, taxonomic identity and age influence DNA preservation while highlighting opportunities for improving institutional preservation practices. Due to standardised preservation conditions, museum collections can provide better insights into DNA damage and degradation over time than archaeological and paleontological samples.

Citations
4
FWCI
15.83
Field percentile
top 1%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISWeiß '15Kistler '17Le '26Kistler '15Gutaker '18Lemmon-Kish '26
80% semantic matchEvolutionary Biology
Clemens L Weiß, Verena J Schuenemann, Jane Devos+6 more·bioRxiv·Jul 24, 2015