Physics in Medicine and BiologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
An Adaptive H-Refinement Method for the Boundary Element Fast Multipole Method for Quasi-static Electromagnetic Modeling
William A. WartmaniD, Konstantin WeiseiD, Manas RachhiD, Leah MoralesiD, Zhi‐De DengiD, Aapo R. NummenmaaiD, Sergey N MakaroffiD
- Citations
- 12
- FWCI
- 1.91
- Field percentile
- top 13%
Abstract
ObjectiveIn our recent work pertinent to modeling of brain stimulation and neurophysiological recordings, substantial modeling errors in the computed electric field and potential have sometimes been observed for standard multi-compartment head models. The goal of this study is to quantify those errors and, further, eliminate them through an adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) algorithm. The study concentrates on transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial electrical stimulation (TES), and electroencephalography (EEG) forward problems. ApproachWe propose, describe, and systematically investigate an AMR method using the Boundary Element Method with Fast Multipole Acceleration (BEM-FMM) as the base numerical solver. The goal is to efficiently allocate additional unknowns to critical areas of the model, where they will best improve solution accuracy. The implemented AMR methods accuracy improvement is measured on head models constructed from 16 Human Connectome Project subjects under problem classes of TES, TMS, and EEG. Errors are computed between three solutions: an initial non-adaptive solution, a solution found after applying AMR with a conservative refinement rate, and a "silver-standard" solution found by subsequent 4:1 global refinement of the adaptively-refined model. Main ResultsExcellent agreement is shown between the adaptively-refined and silver-standard solutions for standard head models. AMR is found to be vital for accurate modeling of TES and EEG forward problems for standard models: an increase of less than 25% (on average) in number of mesh elements for these problems, efficiently allocated by AMR, exposes electric field/potential errors exceeding 60% (on average) in the solution for the unrefined models. SignificanceThis error has especially important implications for TES dosing prediction - where the stimula t ion strength plays a central role - and for EEG lead fields. Though the specific form of the AMR method described here is implemented for the BEM-FMM, we expect that AMR is applicable and even required for accurate electromagnetic simulations by other numerical modeling packages as well.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Charge Based Boundary Element Method with Residual Driven Adaptive Mesh Refinement for High Resolution Electrical Stimulation Modeling
Derek A. Drumm, Gregory M. Noetscher, … Sergey N Makaroff·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jul 9, 2026
- A Software Toolkit for TMS Electric-Field Modeling with Boundary Element Fast Multipole Method: An Efficient MATLAB Implementation
S. N. Makarov, W. A. Wartman, … A. Nummenmaa·bioRxiv·Feb 9, 2020
- Solving High-Resolution Forward Problems for Extra- and Intracranial Neurophysiological Recordings Using Boundary Element Fast Multipole Method
Sergey N. Makarov, Matti Hämäläinen, … Aapo R. Nummenmaa·bioRxiv·Mar 5, 2019
- Fast and Accurate EEG/MEG BEM-Based Forward Problem Solution for High-Resolution Head Models
William A. Wartman, Guillermo Nuñez Ponasso, … Sergey N Makaroff·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Conditions for numerically accurate TMS electric field simulation
L. Gomez, M. Dannhauer, … A. V. Peterchev·bioRxiv·Dec 25, 2018
- Comparative Performance of the Finite Element Method and the Boundary Element Fast Multipole Method for Problems Mimicking Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
A. T. Htet, G. B. Saturnino, … S. N. Makarov·bioRxiv·Dec 21, 2018