A data-driven approach to identifying and evaluating connectivity-based neural correlates of conscious visual perception
Abstract
Identifying the neural correlates of conscious visual perception remains a major challenge in neuroscience, requiring theories that bridge between subjective experience and measurable neural correlates. However, theoretical interpretation of empirical evidence is often post hoc and susceptible to confirmation bias. Building upon the adversarial collaboration mediated by the COGITATE Consortium, we present a generalizable approach for the data-driven identification, evaluation, and theoretical modeling of connectivity-based neural correlates of conscious visual perception. Using the same magnetoencephalography (MEG) dataset and accompanying pre-registered hypotheses from the COGITATE Consortium, we systematically compared 246 functional connectivity (FC) measures between regions predicted to underlie conscious vision by Integrated Information Theory (IIT) and/or Global Neuronal Workspace Theory (GNWT). We identified a family of FC measures based on the barycenter--tracking the center of mass between two signals--as the top-performing stimulus decoding measures that generalize across regions central to predictions of both IIT and GNWT. To interpret these findings within a theoretical framework, we developed neural mass models that recapitulate the neural dynamics hypothesized to underlie conscious perception by each theory. Comparing simulated barycenter values from these models against empirically measured MEG data revealed that both the GNWT-based model, featuring delayed ignition dynamics, and the IIT-based model, which relied on synchronous sensory dynamics, captured the observed connectivity patterns. These results lend tentative support to GNWT, as the presence of ignition dynamics independent of task-demand conditions contradicts the predictions of IIT. Beyond dataset-specific conclusions and limitations, we introduce a framework for systematically identifying and testing candidate neural correlates of conscious visual perception in an unbiased and interpretable manner.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Testing the Spatiotemporal Predictions of Global Neuronal Workspace Theory and Integrated Information Theory
Kavindu H. Bandara, Elise Rowe, Marta Isabel Garrido·bioRxiv·Jul 22, 2026
- An adversarial collaboration to critically evaluate theories of consciousness
Oscar Ferrante, Urszula Górska, … Lucía Melloni·bioRxiv·Jun 23, 2023
- Brain representation in conscious and unconscious vision
Ning Mei, David Soto·Journal of CognitionPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Brain networks in human conscious visual perception
Sharif I. Kronemer, Mark Aksen, … Hal Blumenfeld·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Nov 29, 2022
- Resting-state functional connectivity predictors of subjective visual Gestalt experience
Marilena Wilding, Anja K. Ischebeck, Natalia Zaretskaya·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Jan 24, 2023
- Feedback information sharing in the human brain reflects bistable perception in the absence of report
Andrés Canales‐Johnson, Lola Beerendonk, … Simon van Gaal·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 8, 2023