Imaging NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Assessing adverse effects and unspecific effects of transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS)
Hongyan ZhaoiD, Ulrike HorniD, Melanie FreundiD, Anna Bujanow, Christopher GundlachiD, Gesa HartwigseniD, Falk EippertiD
Abstract
BackgroundTranscutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) is a relatively recent method for non-invasively modulating neuronal activity in the human spinal cord. Despite its growing prominence, comprehensive studies addressing its potential adverse effects (AEs) and unspecific effects (UEs) are lacking. ObjectiveIn this study, we conducted a systematic investigation into the potential AEs and UEs of tsDCS in healthy volunteers. MethodsWe used a randomized double-blind within-participant design, employing anodal, cathodal and sham tsDCS of the thoracolumbar spinal cord. Our approach involved a newly-developed structured questionnaire (to assess subjectively-reported AEs) in combination with tsDCS-concurrent recording of skin conductance, cardiac and respiratory activity (to assess UEs in bodily state). ResultsThe most frequently participant-reported AEs were sensations of burning, tingling, and itching, although they were largely described as mild; skin redness (experimenter-reported) occurred even more frequently. Importantly, when comparing AEs between active and sham tsDCS via frequentist and Bayesian analysis approaches, the results were largely in favour of no difference between conditions (with the exception of skin redness). A similar picture emerged for most UE metrics, suggesting that tsDCS does not induce changes in bodily state, at least as measured by our autonomic nervous system metrics. ConclusionWe believe that the strategy employed here could serve as a starting point for a systematic AE and UE assessment in clinical populations, longitudinal designs and when stimulating different spinal sites. Taken together, our results contribute to assessing the tolerability, safety and specificity of tsDCS, in order to further the investigation of spinal cord function in health and disease.
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.77
- Field percentile
- top 17%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Immediate and long-term effects of transcranial direct-current stimulation in the mouse primary somatosensory cortex
Carlos Andrés Sánchez-León, Isabel Cordones, … Javier Márquez‐Ruiz·bioRxiv·Jul 2, 2020
- The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal and cortico-cortical excitability and response variability: conventional versus high definition montages
Michael Pellegrini, Maryam Zoghi, Shapour J. Jaberzadeh·Neuroscience ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jun 28, 2020
- Expectations May Influence the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Sheida Rabipour, Allan D. Wu, … Marco Iacoboni·NeuropsychologiaPeer-reviewed·Sep 15, 2018
- transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Studies Open Database (tDCS-OD)
Pnina Grossman, Ivan Alekseichuk, … Andrea Antal·bioRxiv·Jul 13, 2018
- Electric field dependent effects of motor cortical TDCS
Ilkka Laakso, Marko Mikkonen, … Satoshi Tanaka·bioRxiv·May 21, 2018
- Neural Mechanisms of tDCS: Insights from an In-Vivo Rodent Model with Realistic Electric Field Strengths
Liyi Chen, Alireza Majdi, … Myles Mc Laughlin·bioRxiv·Dec 20, 2024