Electric field dependent effects of motor cortical TDCS
Ilkka LaaksoiD, Marko Mikkonen, Soichiro KoyamaiD, Daisuke ItoiD, Tomofumi YamaguchiiD, Akimasa HirataiD, Satoshi TanakaiD
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) can modulate motor cortical excitability. However, its after-effects are highly variable between individuals. Individual cranial and brain anatomy may contribute to this variability by producing varying electric fields in each subjects brain. Here we show that these fields are related to excitability changes following anodal TDCS of the primary motor cortex (M1). We found in two experiments (N=28 and N=9) that the after-effects of TDCS were proportional to the individual electric field in M1, calculated using MRI-based models. Individuals with the lowest and highest local electric fields in M1 tended to produce opposite changes in excitability. Furthermore, the effect was field-direction dependent and non-linear with stimulation duration or other experimental parameters. The electric field component pointing into the brain was negatively proportional to the excitability changes following 1 mA 20 min TDCS of right M1 (N=28); the effect was opposite after 1 mA 10 min TDCS of left M1 (N=9). Our results demonstrate that a large part of variability in the after-effects of motor cortical TDCS is due to inter-individual differences in the electric fields. We anticipate that individualized electric field dosimetry could be used to control the neuroplastic effects of TDCS, which is increasingly being explored as a treatment for various neuropsychiatric diseases.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 4
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow
Vishal Rawji, Matteo Ciocca, … Sven Bestmann·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Nov 7, 2017
- Towards the identification and optimization of the "dose-response" relationship of transcranial direct current stimulation
Ricardo Salvador, Maria Chiara Biagi, … Giulio Ruffini·bioRxiv·Jan 22, 2022
- Dose-controlled tDCS reduces electric field intensity variability at a cortical target site
Carys Evans, Clarissa Bachmann, … Sven Bestmann·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Oct 7, 2019
- An in vivo model for transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex in awake mice.
Carlos Andrés Sánchez-León, Pablo Alejandro Reyes-Velásquez, … Michael Andreas Nitsche·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Oct 25, 2025
- The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal and cortico-cortical excitability and response variability: conventional versus high definition montages
Michael Pellegrini, Maryam Zoghi, Shapour J. Jaberzadeh·Neuroscience ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jun 28, 2020
- The impact of brain lesions on tDCS-induced electric field magnitude
Ainslie Johnstone, Catharina Zich, … Sven Bestmann·bioRxiv·Mar 19, 2021