A discovery and replication study of dyslexia does not reveal reproducible gray matter volume differences

Abstract

Two decades of research have provided evidence for gray matter volume (GMV) differences in developmental dyslexia (or reading disability, RD) in the left perisylvian cortex. However, there are concerns about result inconsistencies, likely attributable to small sample sizes, lenient statistical thresholds, and insufficient accounting for demographic variables and global GMV (Ramus et al., 2018). To address these concerns, we conducted a Discovery and Replication Study (N=262) using data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study. We found GMV differences between the RD and Control Groups did not replicate across the Discovery and Replication Studies using voxel-based morphometry (VBM) in Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM), and that a more conservative threshold yielded far fewer results. We then conducted Reproducibility Studies and first found that when using surface-based morphometry in FreeSurfer instead of VBM, the Discovery and the Replication Study results again failed to converge. Second, we combined all groups in a factorial VBM/SPM analysis and the interaction analysis provided quantitative confirmation for diverging between-group difference results across the two studies. Third, we tested for the role of covariates of no interest and found that when total GMV is not controlled for, this divergence dissipates and group differences in RD (main effect of Reading Ability) are amplified. In conclusion, replication of GMV differences in RD is low, even when using large, well-matched groups, and analyses approaches play a modulating role. As such, results from prior studies using lenient statistical thresholds and not accounting for total GMV should therefore be viewed with caution.