Computational Biology and ChemistryBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Spatial Regression of Morphology-Protein Coupling in Tumour Proteomics
Abstract
Spatial proteomics has enabled high-resolution characterization of protein organization within tumor microenvironments, yet most computational approaches implicitly assume spatial homogeneity and focus on clustering rather than diffusion constraints imposed by tissue morphology. Here, we model morphology-protein coupling in triplenegative breast cancer using geographically weighted regression (GWR) applied to 41 publicly available Multiplexed Ion Beam Imaging (MIBI) samples comprising 36 protein markers. Single-cell morphometric features were extracted from MIBI spots and combined with spatial adjacency graphs to model location-specific protein dispersion. Compared with ordinary least squares and ridge regression baselines, GWR consistently demonstrated superior performance across regression metrics, explaining substantially greater spatial variance in protein intensity (+.4 R2 improvements across markers) while reducing mean absolute and squared errors. Information-theoretic analysis showed lower (Aikake Information Criterion Corrected) AICc values for GWR across the majority of markers, indicating improved model fit. Spatial autocorrelation diagnostics further confirmed that GWR residuals exhibited near-random structure, with significant reductions in Morans I and Gearys C relative to global models, demonstrating effective capture of local heterogeneity. Eight proteins with significant spatial autocorrelation, including B7-H3 and -catenin, showed pronounced morphology-dependent dispersion patterns that were not recoverable using global regression. These results demonstrate that explicitly modeling spatial heterogeneity yields more accurate and interpretable representations of protein organization and supports a diffusion-barrier view of pathoproteomics beyond agglomeration alone.
- organism: human
- assay: spatial transcriptomics
- research focus: cell-cell communication
- research focus: spatial domain detection
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 25th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Prediction of Outcome from Spatial Protein Profiling of Triple-Negative Breast Cancers
Ali Foroughi pour, Te-Chia Wu, … Jeffrey H. Chuang·Communications MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jan 29, 2026
- Integrating Spatially Adjusted Protein Summaries for Survival Prediction in Spatial Proteomics
Seungjun Ahn, Eun Jeong Oh, … Ali Shojaie·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2026
- Topological Data Analysis of Spatial Protein Expression in Multiplexed Spatial Proteomics Studies
Sarah Samorodnitsky, Michael C. Wu·bioRxiv·Feb 27, 2026
- X-SPATIO: An Explanatory Deep Learning Pipeline for the Prediction and Visualization of Spatially Resolved Biomarker Expression in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
V. Madhusudhan Rao, Madhumala K. Sadanandappa, … Shrey Sukhadia·bioRxiv·Feb 11, 2026
- Deep topographic proteomics of a human brain tumour
S. Davis, C. Scott, … R. Fischer·bioRxiv·Mar 21, 2022
- Identifying tissue states by spatial protein patterns related to chemotherapy response in triple-negative breast cancer
Luciana Melina Luque, Asif Khan, … Linus J. Schumacher·bioRxiv·Oct 6, 2025