bioRxivCancer BiologyPreprint
Identifying tissue states by spatial protein patterns related to chemotherapy response in triple-negative breast cancer
Luciana Melina LuqueiD, Asif KhaniD, Giuseppe Torrisi, Tessa D Green, David T A HardmaniD, Claudia Owczarek, T. A. Phillips, Debora S. MarksiD, Maddy ParsonsiD, Chris SanderiD, Linus J. SchumacheriD
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive malignancy with limited targeted therapies and variable responses to conventional chemotherapy, influenced by intratumoral heterogeneity and complex tumor microenvironment (TME) interactions. Understanding spatiotemporal cellular interplay and tissue organization is crucial for advancing tumor biology and improving patient stratification. Spatially resolved proteomics, such as Imaging Mass Cytometry (IMC), offers a powerful approach to dissect the TME. We present an end-to-end computational pipeline for robust quantitative analysis of large-scale IMC datasets, addressing the challenge of batch effects through image-level contrast adjustment. Applying this framework to 813 tissue regions encompassing over 4 million cells from 63 TNBC patients, we revealed distinct spatial arrangements of cell types between chemotherapy responders and non-responders. Non-responders showed reduced cytotoxic T-cell infiltration into tumor regions and increased spatial co-localization between fibroblasts and macrophages, a pattern that persisted and intensified after chemotherapy treatment. To integrate these complex spatial-molecular relationships, we used graph neural networks (GNNs) to predict treatment response from pre-treatment samples with AUROC=0.71. Interpretability analysis identified B7H4, CD11b, CD366, and FOXP3 as the most predictive protein markers, with fibroblasts, cancer cells, and CD8+ T cells being the most informative cell types. This study introduces a scalable analytical framework for spatial proteomics with interpretable predictions, suggesting features of tissue state that could guide treatment decisions in TNBC and further our understanding of the spatial determinants of therapeutic response.
- organism: human
- assay: spatial transcriptomics
- research focus: cell-cell communication
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: protein structure prediction
- approach: deep learning
- approach: graph neural network
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Spatial and Compositional Biomarkers in Tumor Microenvironment Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Haoyang Mi, Ravi Varadhan, … Aleksander S. Popel·bioRxiv·Dec 18, 2023
- Spatial Logic Reconciles Gene-signature Methods in Triple Negative Breast Cancer
William C Bastian, Jane Lowe Meisel, … Xiaoxian Li·bioRxiv·Aug 18, 2026
- Temporal and spatial composition of the tumor microenvironment predicts response to immune checkpoint inhibition
Noah F. Greenwald, Iris Nederlof, … Michael Angelo·bioRxiv·Jan 26, 2025
- Prediction of Outcome from Spatial Protein Profiling of Triple-Negative Breast Cancers
Ali Foroughi pour, Te-Chia Wu, … Jeffrey H. Chuang·Communications MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jan 29, 2026
- Spatially distinct cellular and molecular landscapes define prognosis in triple negative breast cancer
Kavitha Mukund, Darya Veraksa, … Shankar Subramaniam·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Dec 31, 2025
- QUICHE reveals structural definitions of anti-tumor responses in triple negative breast cancer
Jolene S. Ranek, Noah F. Greenwald, … Michael Angelo·bioRxiv·Jan 6, 2025