bioRxivPhysiologyPreprint
No cardiac phase bias for threat perception under naturalistic conditions in immersive virtual reality
Felix KlotzscheiD, Paweł MotykaiD, Aleksander Molak, Václav Sahula, Barbora DarmováiD, Conor Byrnes, Iveta FajnerováiD, Michael GaebleriD
Abstract
Previous studies have found that threatening stimuli are more readily perceived and more intensely experienced when presented during cardiac systole compared to diastole. Also, threatening stimuli are judged as physically closer than neutral ones. In a pre-registered study, we tested these effects and their interaction using a naturalistic (interactive, 3D) experimental design in immersive virtual reality: We briefly displayed threatening and non-threatening animals (four each) at varying distances (1.5-5.5 meters) to a group of young, healthy participants (n = 41), while recording their ECGs (electrocardiograms). Participants then pointed to the location where they had seen the animal (ca. 29k trials in total). Our pre-registered analyses indicated that perceived distances to both threatening and non-threatening animals did not differ significantly between cardiac phases - with Bayesian analysis supporting the null hypothesis. There was also no evidence for an association between subjective fear and perceived proximity to threatening animals. These results contrast with previous findings that used verbal or declarative distance measures in less naturalistic experimental conditions. Furthermore, our findings suggest that the cardiac phase-related variation in threat processing may not generalize across different paradigms and may be less relevant in naturalistic scenarios than under more abstract experimental conditions. Impact statementTo our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the influence of interoceptive cardiac signals on visual perception using naturalistic stimuli in immersive virtual reality. We based the design of our experiment on previous reports about threat processing biases and the role of the cardiac cycle but did not observe the expected effects. This poses the question of their generalizability from abstract settings to more naturalistic setups, featuring greater behavioral engagement and a richer sensory environment.
- organism: human
- assay: electrophysiology
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Early threat perception is independent of later cognitive and behavioral control. A virtual reality-EEG-ECG study
Juanzhi Lu, Selma K. Kemmerer, … Béatrice de Gelder·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·May 17, 2023
- Oscillatory correlates of threat imminence during virtual navigation
Galit Karpov, Mei‐Heng Lin, … Travis E. Baker·PsychophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 22, 2024
- Interactions between cardiac activity and conscious somatosensory perception
Paweł Motyka, Martin Grund, … Michael Gaebler·PsychophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 27, 2019
- Heart Is Deceitful Above All Things: illusory perception of heartbeat is induced by pain expectation.
Eleonora Parrotta, Patric Bach, … Francesca Ferri·CognitionPeer-reviewed·Jan 25, 2024
- Linking brain-heart interactions to emotional arousal in immersive virtual reality
Antonin Fourcade, Felix Klotzsche, … Michael Gaebler·PsychophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 14, 2024
- Neural Control of Autonomic Arousal During Threat Anticipation Revealed by High-Resolution Cardiac Contractility
Joanne E. Stasiak, Jingyi Wang, … Regina Carla Lapate·bioRxiv·Feb 26, 2026