Pollinator habitat plantings benefit wild, native bees, but do not necessarily favor rare species
D. P. Cariveau, M. Roswell, T. Harrison, M. A. Genung, J. Gibbs, R. Winfree
Abstract
O_LIInstalling pollinator habitat is a ubiquitous conservation tool, but little is known about which pollinator taxa require support, or which benefit from habitat installations. C_LIO_LIWe studied the response of rare and common bees to pollinator habitat enhancement. We used independent regional datasets to designate bee species as common or rare based on their rank according to one of three metrics: a) site occurrence frequency, b) local relative abundance, and c) geographic range size. We asked whether the abundance or richness of rare and common bees were greater in pollinator habitat, relative to old-field controls. Because we used an arbitrary, quantile-based cutoff to categorize species rarity, we conducted sensitivity analysis and controlled for rarity classification errors with a null model. With this null model, we determined whether rare and/or common species responded to pollinator habitat disproportionately, compared to the expectation for typical bee species. C_LIO_LIWe found that the number of individuals and of species designated as rare based on local relative abundance was greater in pollinator habitat enhancements. The number of individuals from bee species designated as rare based on site occurrence was lower in pollinator habitat enhancements, but the number of species was not clearly different between habitat types. We did not find a clear positive nor negative effect of habitat enhancement for species designated rare based on geographic range size. For all three rarity metrics, common species increased in abundance and richness in pollinator habitat relative to controls. Null models indicated that in most cases, neither rare nor common species disproportionately benefited from pollinator habitat. C_LIO_LISynthesis and Applications: Our results suggest that pollinator habitat can lead to an increase in the abundance and richness of bees, including species that are rare and that are common. However, rare species appeared to respond differently than typical species, and depending on how species were classified as rare, could display muted or even negative responses to habitat enhancement. Targeting rare species with specific floral resources or unique habitat types may lead to better outcomes for rare and threatened species. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Habitat preference influences response to changing agricultural landscapes in two long-horned bees.
G. S. Hirayama, A. Ushimaru·bioRxiv·Apr 15, 2022
- Bees use anthropogenic habitats despite strong natural habitat preferences
M. A. Collado, D. Sol, I. Bartomeus·bioRxiv·Mar 8, 2018
- Safeguarding pollinators requires specific habitat prescriptions and substantially more land area than current policy suggests
A. Pindar, A. Hogg, N. E. Raine·bioRxiv·Dec 14, 2020
- Forest edges and other semi-natural habitat edges increase wild bee species richness and habitat connectivity in intensively managed temperate landscapes.
Markus A. K. Sydenham, Anders Nielsen, … Bastiaan Star·Conservation BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 30, 2025
- Bees support farming. Does farming support bees?
P. S. Virkar, E. Siddhu, V. P. Uniyal·bioRxiv·Oct 14, 2019
- Pollinator niche partitioning and asymmetric facilitation contribute to the maintenance of diversity
N. Wei, R. L. Kaczorowski, … T.-L. Ashman·bioRxiv·Mar 2, 2020