bioRxivScientific Communication & Education
Wikipedia as a tool for contemporary history of science: A case study on CRISPR
O. Benjakob, O. Guley, J.-M. Sevin, L. Blondel, A. Augustoni, M. Collet, L. Jouveshomme, R. Amit, A. Linder, R. Aviram
Abstract
Rapid developments and methodological divides hinder the study of how scientific knowledge accumulates, consolidates and transfers to the public sphere. Our work proposes using Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia, as a historiographical source for contemporary science. We chose the high-profile field of gene editing as our test case, performing a historical analysis of the English-language Wikipedia articles on CRISPR. Using a mixed method approach, we qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed its text, sections and references, alongside 50 affiliated articles. These, we found, documented CRISPRs maturation from a fundamental scientific discovery to a biotechnological revolution with vast social and cultural implications. We developed automated tools to support such research generically and demonstrated its applicability on two other scientific fields we have previously studied - COVID-19 and Circadian clocks. This method makes use of Wikipedia as a digital and free archive, documenting the incremental growth of knowledge and the manner scientific research accumulates and translates into public discourse. Using Wikipedia in this manner compliments and overcomes some issues with contemporary histories and can also augment existing bibliometric research.
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- research focus: development & morphogenesis
- research focus: database / resource
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: deep learning
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- High Impact: Wikipedia sources and edit history document two decades of the climate change field
O. Benjakob, L. Jouveshomme, … R. Aviram·bioRxiv·Nov 30, 2023
- Citation needed?Wikipedia bibliometrics during the first waveof the COVID-19 pandemic.
O. Benjakob, R. Aviram, J. A. Sobel·bioRxiv·Mar 1, 2021
- COVID-19 research in Wikipedia
G. Colavizza·bioRxiv·May 10, 2020
- Combining Crowdsourcing and Deep Learning to Assess Public Opinion on CRISPR-Cas9
M. Muller, M. Schneider, … E. Vayena·bioRxiv·Dec 10, 2019
- Measuring the quality of scientific references in Wikipedia: an analysis of more than 115M citations to over 800,000 scientific articles
J. M. Nicholson, A. Uppala, … S. Rife·bioRxiv·Apr 8, 2020
- Pre-existing Technological Core and Roots for the CRISPR Breakthrough
C. L. Magee, P. W. Kleyn, … S. Basnet·bioRxiv·May 24, 2018