Concerning suppression and facilitation of motion perception in humans
Abstract
Here we consider some topics from a commentary by Tzvetanov (2018) on our article entitled \"Suppression and facilitation of human neural responses\" (Schallmo et al., 2018). The author raises two main points of criticism, which we will summarize thus: 1) psychophysical response bias is not adequately modeled, and 2) other computational models may be better suited to describe the psychophysical motion discrimination data. Both of these points are reasonable in principle, but we disagree with the author in a few areas. We provide some discussion of both issues in order to further elevate the scientific dialogue.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Suppression and facilitation of motion perception in humans
Tzvetomir Tzvetanov·bioRxiv·Nov 9, 2018
- Suppression and facilitation of human neural responses
Michael‐Paul Schallmo, Alex M. Kale, … Scott O. Murray·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jan 29, 2018
- A neural basis for the spatial suppression of visual motion perception
Liu D Liu, Ralf M Haefner, Christopher C Pack·bioRxiv·May 5, 2016
- Feature-based attention induces non-linearities in neuronal tuning and behavior during visual motion perception
Sang-Ah Yoo, Julio Martínez-Trujillo, … Mazyar Fallah·bioRxiv·Feb 17, 2021
- Tactile suppression during movement as optimal integration of somatosensory feedback across time
Fabian Tatai, Dimitris Voudouris, … Constantin A. Rothkopf·bioRxiv·Sep 18, 2026
- Motion displaces population receptive fields in the direction opposite to motion
Marian Schneider, Ingo Marquardt, … Rainer Goebel·bioRxiv·Sep 9, 2019