Species, causes, and outcomes of wildlife rehabilitation in New York State
M. Hanson, N. Hollingshead, K. Schuler, W. F. Siemer, P. Martin, E. M. Bunting
Abstract
Wildlife rehabilitation is a publicly popular though highly controversial practice. State wildlife agencies frequently debate the ecological impact of rehabilitation. Analysis of case records could inform that debate by clarifying and quantifying the causes for rehabilitation, species involved, and treatment outcomes. This information could aid in the ability of regulatory agencies and rehabilitators to make informed decisions and gain insight into causes of species decline. In New York, rehabilitators are licensed by the Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) and thus, are required to submit annual reports. Between 2012-2014, 59,370 individual wildlife cases were seen by licensed rehabilitators comprising 31,229 (52.6%) birds, 25,490 (42.9%) mammals, 2,423 (4.1%) reptiles, and 73 (0.1%) amphibians. We identified patterns among taxonomic representation, reasons for presentation, and disposition. Major causes of presentation were trauma (n = 22,672, 38.2%) and orphaning (n = 21,876, 36.8%), with habitat loss (n =3,746, 6.3%), infectious disease (n = 1,992, 3.4%), and poisoning or toxin exposure (n = 864, 1.5%) playing lesser roles. The overall release rate for animals receiving care was 50.2%; 45.4% were either euthanized or died during the rehabilitation process. A relatively small number (0.3%) were permanently non-releasable and placed in captivity, and 4.1% had unknown outcomes. In comparison to data from 1989, wildlife submissions have increased (annual mean 12,583 vs 19,790), as has the release rate, from 44.4% to 50.2%. Utilizing a large data set allowed us to fill knowledge gaps, which can help inform management by both the rehabilitators and the state agencies that regulate them, deepening understanding of the scope and impacts of wildlife rehabilitation.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The impact of human activities on Australian wildlife
A. Taylor-Brown, R. Booth, … G. Conroy·bioRxiv·Oct 24, 2018
- Evaluating wildlife rehabilitation: Successful return of rehabilitated gulls in the wild
Tine Uytterschaut, Reinoud Allaert, … Frederick Verbruggen·bioRxiv·Sep 22, 2025
- Causes, temporal trends and the effects of urbanisation on admissions of wild raptors to rehabilitation centres in England and Wales
C. T. Panter, S. Allen, … A. Amar·bioRxiv·Feb 10, 2022
- Internal and external features of wild birds after collisions without apparent trauma in Japan
N. Ushine, A. Tanaka, … S.-i. Hayama·bioRxiv·May 25, 2021
- Helminth infection dynamics in rehabilitating Javan slow lorises are driven by time since deworming rather than host traits
Abdullah Langgeng, Marie Sigaud, … Ikki Matsuda·International Journal for Parasitology Parasites and WildlifePeer-reviewed·May 27, 2026
- HOW MANY GAMEBIRDS ARE RELEASED IN THE UK EACH YEAR?
J. R. Madden·bioRxiv·Oct 22, 2020