bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Stress, Heartbeats, and Biases: Cardiac phase and acute stress modulate affective and spatial response bias.
Leon von HaugwitziD, Romina SadriD, Edmund WascheriD, Mauro F. LarraiD
Abstract
Threatening situations often require rapid decisions which are particularly susceptible to response bias. The perception of threat also elicits an acute stress reaction, assumed to promote automatic action tendencies via several mechanisms. Cardioafferent signals during systole, for example, increase racially biased misidentifications of tools as weapons. Acute stress, linked to threat-biased decisions may both bias such decisions directly and alter cardiac effects on them. Here, we investigated the effects of cardiac phase and acute stress in a combined Weapon Identification and Simon Task. Thirty-one participants classified laterally or vertically presented weapons and tools with lateralized responses, such that target location and prime emotion provided task-irrelevant spatial and affective information. Target onsets were timed to systole or diastole, and in separate sessions participants were exposed to repeated feet cold pressor tests (CPT) and a warm-water control condition. The CPT reliably increased subjective, cardiovascular, and endocrine stress measures. Both systolic target onsets and CPT exposure strengthened the influence of emotional primes on weapon and tool classification, without evidence for general threat prioritization. For spatial compatibility, acute stress enlarged the Simon effect in sensitivity among fast responses, consistent with stronger initial automatic activation, and cardiac phase modulated the advantage of spatial correspondence over locations without dimensional overlap. Midfrontal theta showed prime-dependent target modulations with distinct patterns for cardiac phase and stress. Cardiac phase and stress did not interact, consistent with independent contributions rather than amplification or attenuation. Together, the findings indicate that acute stress and phasic cardioafferent signals both increase the influence of task-irrelevant affective and spatial information on action through partly distinct processes.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Immediate effects of psychosocial stress on attention depend on subjective experience and not directly on stress-related physiological changes
Ismael Palacios-García, Mario Villena‐González, … J. R. Silva·bioRxiv·Nov 22, 2017
- Stretch-induced muscle responses under threat vs safety
Yvonne F. Visser, Bob Bramson, … Luc P. J. Selen·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2026
- Emotional Metacognition: Stimulus Valence Modulates Cardiac Arousal and Metamemory
Nicolas Legrand, Sebastian Scott Engen, … Micah Allen·Cognition & EmotionPeer-reviewed·Dec 20, 2020
- Stress diminishes outcome but enhances response representations during instrumental learning
Jacqueline Katharina Meier, Bernhard P. Staresina, Lars Schwabe·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jul 18, 2022
- Acute stress impairs target enhancement rather than distractor suppression in attention selection: Evidence from the N2pc and PD
Jingqing Nian, Run Qing Yang, … Yu Luo·BMC PsychologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 30, 2025
- No cardiac phase bias for threat perception under naturalistic conditions in immersive virtual reality
F. Klotzsche, P. Motyka, … M. Gaebler·bioRxiv·Jan 31, 2024