bioRxivNeuroscience
Incorporating and compensating cerebrospinal fluid in surface-based forward models of magneto- and electroencephalography
Abstract
MEG/EEG source imaging is usually done using a three-shell (3-S) or a simpler head model. Such models omit cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) that strongly affects the volume currents. We present a four-compartment (4-C) boundary-element (BEM) model that incorporates the CSF and is computationally efficient and straightforward to build using freely available software. We propose a way for compensating the omission of CSF by decreasing the skull conductivity of the 3-S model, and study the robustness of the 4-C and 3-S models to errors in skull conductivity.\n\nWe generated dense boundary meshes using MRI datasets and automated SimNIBS pipeline. Then, we built a dense 4-C reference model using Galerkin BEM, and 4-C and 3-S test models using coarser meshes and both Galerkin and collocation BEMs. We compared field topographies of cortical sources, applying various skull conductivities and fitting conductivities that minimized the relative error in 4-C and 3-S models. When the CSF was left out from the EEG model, our compensated, unbiased approach improved the accuracy of the 3-S model considerably compared to the conventional approach, where CSF is neglected without any compensation (mean relative error 40%). The error due to the omission of CSF was of the same order in MEG and compensated EEG. EEG has, however, large overall error due to uncertain skull conductivity.\n\nOur results show that a realistic 4-C MEG/EEG model can be implemented using standard tools and basic BEM, without excessive workload or computational burden. If the CSF is omitted, compensated skull conductivity should be used in EEG.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Four-Sphere Head Model For EEG Signals Revisited
Solveig Næss, Chaitanya Chintaluri, … Daniel Krzysztof Wojcik·Frontiers in Human NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 18, 2017
- The impact of CSF-filled cavities on scalp EEG and its implications
Vitória Piai, Robert Oostenveld, … Maria Carla Piastra·PsychophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 14, 2024
- Evaluating the Influence of Anatomical Accuracy and Electrode Positions on EEG Forward Solutions
Jesper Duemose Nielsen, Oula Puonti, … Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jun 29, 2023
- Using reciprocity for relating the simulation of transcranial current stimulation to the EEG forward problem
Sven Wagner, Felix Lucka, … Carsten H. Wolters·bioRxiv·Mar 15, 2016
- Fast and Accurate EEG/MEG BEM-Based Forward Problem Solution for High-Resolution Head Models
William A. Wartman, Guillermo Nuñez Ponasso, … Sergey N Makaroff·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Myelin-informed forward models for M/EEG source reconstruction
Saskia Helbling, Sofie S. Meyer, Nikolaus Weiskopf·bioRxiv·Jun 30, 2024