Psychological MedicineNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Impaired Visuospatial Working Memory but Preserved Attentional Control in Bipolar Disorder
Catherine V. Barnes-ScheufleriD, Lara RösleriD, Carmen SchiweckiD, Benjamin PetersiD, Silke MaturaiD, Jutta S. MayeriD, Sarah Kittel‐SchneideriD, Michael SchaumiD, Andreas ReifiD, Michael WibraliD, Robert A. BittneriD
Abstract
BACKGROUNDPersistent deficits in working memory (WM) and attention have considerable clinical and functional impact in people with bipolar disorder (PBD). Understanding the neurocognitive underpinnings of these interacting cognitive constructs might facilitate the discovery of more effective pro-cognitive interventions. Therefore, we employed a paradigm designed for jointly studying attentional control and WM encoding. METHODSWe used a visuospatial change-detection task using four Gabor Patches with differing orientations in 63 euthymic PBD and 76 healthy controls (HCS), which investigated attentional competition during WM encoding. To manipulate bottom-up attention using stimulus salience, two Gabor patches flickered, which were designated as either targets or distractors. To manipulate top-down attention, the Gabor patches were preceded by either a predictive or a non-predictive cue for the target locations. RESULTSAcross all task conditions, PBD stored significantly less information in visual WM than HCS (significant effect of group). However, we observed no significant group by salience or group by cue interactions. This indicates that impaired WM was not caused by deficits in attentional control. CONCLUSIONSOur results imply that while WM is disturbed in PBD, attentional prioritization of salient targets and distractors as well as the utilization of external top-down cues were not compromised. Consequently, the control of attentional selection appears be intact. These findings provide important constraints for models of WM dysfunction in PBD by indicating that later stages of WM encoding are likely primarily impaired. We also demonstrate that selective attention is not among the main sources of cognitive impairment in PBD.
- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Field percentile
- top 12%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- External Cues Improve Visual Working Memory Encoding in the Presence of Salient Distractors in Schizophrenia
Catherine V. Barnes-Scheufler, Lara Rösler, … Robert A. Bittner·Psychological MedicinePeer-reviewed·Mar 4, 2024
- Dissecting the neural focus of attention reveals distinct processes for spatial attention and object-based storage in visual working memory
Nicole Hakim, Kirsten C. S. Adam, … Edward K. Vogel·Psychological SciencePeer-reviewed·Feb 28, 2019
- Controlling the flow of interruption in working memory
Nicole Hakim, Tobias Feldmann‐Wüstefeld, … Edward K. Vogel·bioRxiv·Sep 8, 2020
- Neural bases of space-specific distractor biases in visual working memory
Deepak Velgapuni Raya, Sanchit Gupta, Devarajan Sridharan·bioRxiv·Dec 24, 2023
- Unattended but actively stored: EEG dynamics reveal a dissociation between selective attention and storage in working memory
Eren Günseli, Johannes J. Fahrenfort, … Christian N. L. Olivers·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Sep 18, 2019
- Common neural mechanisms control attention and working memory
Ying Joey Zhou, Clayton E. Curtis, … Daryl Lawrence Fougnie·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 4, 2022