Neural bases of space-specific distractor biases in visual working memory
Deepak Velgapuni RayaiD, Sanchit GuptaiD, Devarajan SridharaniD
Abstract
Information held in working memory (WM) is remarkably resilient to distraction. Yet, perceptual distractors that share mnemonic features can impact WM profoundly; the neural basis of this phenomenon remains unclear. With multivariate decoding of human electroencephalography recordings, we investigate how delay-period perceptual distractors bias WM. Participants memorized the orientations of cued and uncued grating memoranda that appeared in opposite hemifields. A grating distractor, flashed during the delay period, produces space-specific biases: memorized features are attracted towards or repelled away from the distractors orientation depending, respectively, on when the distractor appeared in the same hemifield as the memorandum, or opposite to it. Neural prioritization in WM by cueing, and stronger memorandum maintenance mitigate this bias, whereas stronger distractor encoding enhances it. Lastly, a ring-attractor model with cross-hemifield inhibition mechanistically explains the origins of these spatially-antagonistic biases. Our results reveal how lateralized sensory buffers critically enable perceptual distractors to bias visual WM. Lay SummaryWorking memory (WM) - the ability to momentarily store important items - is remarkably robust to distraction. Yet, when a salient object with features resembling the memorized item ("perceptual distractor") appears in the environment, it can alter WM appreciably. What neural mechanisms render WM resilient to distraction, and how can perceptual distractors affect it so profoundly? We address this question by presenting a salient distractor, at unpredictable times, during the WM delay-period. Surprisingly, the distractors bias on WM depends on its proximity to the memorandums original location. With state-of-the-art neural decoding and computational modeling, we identify mechanisms that mediate these space-specific distractor effects. The findings advance our understanding of WMs resilience to distraction and may inform cognitive therapies for treating WM deficits.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Working Memory Representations in Visual Cortex Mediate the Effects of Distraction
Grace E. Hallenbeck, Thomas C. Sprague, … Clayton E. Curtis·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Aug 5, 2021
- Spatial working memory representations in human cortex are robust to a task-irrelevant interrupting stimulus
Kelvin Vu-Cheung, Edward F. Ester, Thomas C. Sprague·bioRxiv·Sep 16, 2021
- Memory recall errors reflect interacting sensory and mnemonic representations
Holly Kular, John T. Serences·Psychonomic Bulletin & ReviewPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2026
- Contralateral delay activity during dynamic spatial updates in working memory
Charles Chernik, Ronald van den Berg, Mikael Lundqvist·bioRxiv·Feb 27, 2024
- Dissecting the neural focus of attention reveals distinct processes for spatial attention and object-based storage in visual working memory
Nicole Hakim, Kirsten C. S. Adam, … Edward K. Vogel·Psychological SciencePeer-reviewed·Feb 28, 2019
- Neural dynamics of visual working memory representation during sensory distraction
Jonas Karolis Degutis, Simon Weber, … John–Dylan Haynes·bioRxiv·Apr 12, 2024