Needle in a haystack? A comparison of eDNA metabarcoding and targeted qPCR for detection of the great crested newt (Triturus cristatus)
Lynsey R. HarperiD, Lori Lawson HandleyiD, Christoph HahniD, Neil BoonhamiD, Helen C. ReesiD, Kevin C. GoughiD, Erin Lewis, Ian P. AdamsiD, Peter N. M. BrothertoniD, Susanna Phillips, Bernd HänflingiD
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis is a rapid, cost-effective, non-invasive biodiversity monitoring tool which utilises DNA left behind in the environment by organisms for species detection. The method is used as a species specific survey tool for rare or invasive species across a broad range of ecosystems. Recently, eDNA and metabarcoding have been combined to describe whole communities rather than focusing on single target species. However, whether metabarcoding is as sensitive as targeted approaches for rare species detection remains to be evaluated. The great crested newt Triturus cristatus is a flagship pond species of international conservation concern and the first UK species to be routinely monitored using eDNA. We evaluate whether eDNA metabarcoding has comparable sensitivity to targeted real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) for T. cristatus detection. Extracted eDNA samples (N = 532) were screened for T. cristatus by qPCR and analysed for all vertebrate species using High-Throughput Sequencing technology. With qPCR and a detection threshold of 1/12 positive qPCR replicates, newts were detected in 50% of ponds. Detection decreased to 32% when the threshold was increased to 4/12 positive qPCR replicates. With metabarcoding, newts were detected in 34% of ponds without a detection threshold, and in 28% of ponds when a threshold (0.028%) was applied. Therefore, qPCR provided greater detection than metabarcoding but metabarcoding detection with no threshold was equivalent to qPCR with a stringent detection threshold. The proportion of T. cristatus sequences in each sample was positively associated with the number of positive qPCR replicates (qPCR score) suggesting eDNA metabarcoding may be indicative of eDNA concentration. eDNA metabarcoding holds enormous potential for holistic biodiversity assessment and routine freshwater monitoring. We advocate this community approach to freshwater monitoring to guide management and conservation, whereby entire communities can be initially surveyed to best inform use of funding and time for species-specific surveys.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 247
- FWCI
- 15.98
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Generating and testing ecological hypotheses at the pondscape with environmental DNA metabarcoding: a case study on a threatened amphibian
L. R. Harper, L. Lawson Handley, … B. Hänfling·Environmental DNAPeer-reviewed·Nov 28, 2019
- Extending sampling approaches for great crested newt (Triturus cristatus) eDNA monitoring
Lynsey R. Harper, Kirsten J. Harper, … Bastian Egeter·Ecological Solutions and EvidencePeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2025
- Species-specific versus community-wide assays in eDNA monitoring of European eel Anguilla anguilla: Trade-offs between detection sensitivity and the value of additional community data
Angus I T Monaghan, Graham S. Sellers, … Jonathan David Bolland·bioRxiv·Mar 26, 2026
- Beyond fish eDNA metabarcoding: Field replicates disproportionately improve the detection of stream associated vertebrate species
Till‐Hendrik Macher, Robin Schütz, … Florian Leese·Metabarcoding and MetagenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jul 13, 2021
- eDNA in a bottleneck: obstacles to fish metabarcoding studies in megadiverse freshwater systems
J. M. Jackman, C. Benvenuto, … N. G. Sales·bioRxiv·Jan 5, 2021
- Freshwater fish community assessment using eDNA metabarcoding vs. capture-based methods: differences in efficiency and resolution coupled to habitat and ecology
Manuel Curto, Sofia Batista, … Hugo F. Gante·Environmental ResearchPeer-reviewed·Feb 26, 2025