bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Where to stop psi-BLAST iterations so that the found sequences remain related to the query sequence?
Natalya S. BogatyrevaiD, Alexei V. FinkelsteiniD, Dmitry N. IvankoviD
Abstract
The BLAST program [Altschul et al., 1990, J. Mol. Biol., 215:403-410] stands as a widely used tool for the search of the most similar sequences, while the iterative {Psi}-BLAST program [Altschul et al., 1997, Nucl. Acids Res., 25:3389-3402] offers a high sensitivity for detecting remote homologs of the query sequence through an iterative usage of the BLAST search. However, the number of iterations that have to be used by the {Psi}-BLAST is rather poorly justified in the literature. Our study shows that, as the number of iterations increases, {Psi}-BLAST rapidly loses the ability to be guided by the query sequence in the search for homologs. When working with the non-redundant (nr) sequence database of 2021, {Psi}-BLAST, already after the second iteration, retains the query sequence at the top of the list of the found homologs to this sequence in only 18% of cases. Moreover, a query sequence is still listed among homologs found by {Psi}-BLAST after the recommended 10 iterations [Altschul et al., 1997, Nucl. Acids Res., 25:3389-3402] in only 42% of cases. Using a considerably smaller nr database-2011 as a reference, we reveal that these effects intensify over time. Our findings underscore the necessity for circumspection when interpreting {Psi}-BLAST outcomes; the degree of vigilance must increase with the database size. A vigilant monitoring of the position of the query sequence in the array of detected homologs is needed. We recommend using the disappearance of the query sequence from the list of homologs produced by {Psi}-BLAST as a criterion to conclude the {Psi}-BLAST iterations.
- assay: protein sequence
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Simple adjustment of the sequence weight algorithm remarkably enhances PSI-BLAST performance
Toshiyuki Oda, Kyungtaek Lim, Kentaro Tomii·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 2, 2017
- Incremental BLAST: incremental addition of new sequence databases through e-value correction
Sajal Dash, Sarthok Rasique Rahman, … Wu-chun Feng·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Apr 22, 2021
- iSeqsSearch: Incremental Protein Search for iBlast/iMMSeqs2/iDiamond
Hyunwoo Yoo, Mohammad S. Refahi, … GAIL L. ROSEN·bioRxiv·Sep 9, 2024
- A new paradigm for biological sequence retrieval inspired by natural language processing and database research
Axel-Jan Rousseau, Sébastien Lemal, … Dirk Valkenborg·bioRxiv·Nov 7, 2023
- A BLAST from the past: revisiting blastp's E-value
Yang Young Lu, William Stafford Noble, Uri Keich·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 28, 2024
- Protein language model powers accurate and fast sequence search for remote homology
Wei Liu, Ziye Wang, … Shanfeng Zhu·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Mar 30, 2024