bioRxivPlant BiologyPreprint
Cross-compatibility of five highbush blueberry varieties and ideal crossing combinations
Abstract
Blueberry plants require large quantities of pollen deposited on stigmas to produce commercial-quality fruit. Like many agricultural crops, the interaction between pollen-source variety and pollen-recipient variety can be a major determinant of fruit quality in blueberries. However, little information exists to guide growers in optimising fruit set and quality. Using five commonly grown blueberry varieties, I determined whether crossing between varieties (inter-varietal) increased fruit mass and decreased developmental time relative to crossing within a variety (intra-varietal), and if so, what the best crossing combinations are. While intra-varietal pollination often produced fruit, for certain varieties the fruit set and fruit mass were highly reduced compared to inter-varietal pollination. Furthermore, intra-varietal pollination resulted in longer fruit developmental time in comparison to pollination between varieties. For the same pollen-recipient variety, inter-varietal crosses typically outperformed intra-varietal crosses in fruit mass and developmental time; however, the extent to which inter-varietal crosses outperformed intra-varietal crosses differed between pollen-donor varieties. This result suggests that combinations of varieties are not trivial as some inter-varietal combinations may outperform others. Furthermore, some varieties appear to be more susceptible to the negative effects of intra-varietal crosses than others and that less susceptible varieties may be better suited to conditions where pollinator movement is poor. While our study can guide growers in determining optimal co-planting schemes for the varieties tested, for example in South Africa where these varieties are frequently grown. It also serves as a blueprint for similar compatibility studies that can easily be performed prior to planting to determine the best inter-varietal combinations.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genotypic variation in blueberry flower morphology and nectar reward content affects pollinator attraction in a diverse breeding population
J. Cromie, J. J. Ternest, … P. R. Munoz·BMC Plant BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 29, 2024
- Honey bees, Apis mellifera, are important pollinators of the highbush blueberry variety Ventura despite the inability to sonicate
K. Martin, B. Anderson, … M. de Jager·bioRxiv·Feb 16, 2019
- Assessing the effectiveness of honey bee pollinators for cultivated blueberries in South Africa
K. Martin, B. Anderson, … C. Minnaar·bioRxiv·Sep 3, 2021
- Managed Bee Pollination Enhances Yield and Seed Quality in Brassica napus through Flowering Duration and Agronomic Trait Modulation
Chen Daoyin, li yihuan, … Xiaoling Su·bioRxiv·Apr 15, 2026
- Experimental evidence of nocturnal pollination services for berry crops
E. Blareau, F. Requier·bioRxiv·Nov 2, 2023
- Colony-level pollen collection reflects visitation of managed bumble bees (Bombus impatiens) in strawberry fields and surrounding landscapes without reducing pollen limitation.
Leeah I. Richardson, Olivia Miller, … Heather L. Grab·Agricultural and Forest EntomologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 22, 2026