Genotypic variation in blueberry flower morphology and nectar reward content affects pollinator attraction in a diverse breeding population
Juliana CromieiD, John J. TernestiD, Andrew P. Komatz, P. M. AdunolaiD, Camila Ferreira AzevedoiD, Rachel E. MallingeriD, Patricio MuńoziD
Abstract
Pollination is crucial to obtain optimal blueberry yield and fruit quality. Despite substantial investments in seasonal beekeeping services, blueberry producers consistently report suboptimal pollinator visitation and fruit set in some cultivars. Flower morphology and floral rewards are among the key factors that have shown to contribute to pollinator attraction, however little is known about their relative importance for improving yield in the context of plant breeding. Clarifying the relationships between flower morphology, nectar reward content, pollinator recruitment, and pollination outcomes, as well as their genetic components, can inform breeding priorities for enhancing yield. In the present study, we measured ten flower and nectar traits and indices of successful pollination, including fruit set, seed count, and fruit weight in 38 southern highbush blueberry genotypes. Additionally, we assessed pollinator visitation frequency and foraging behavior over two growing seasons. Several statistical models were tested to optimize the prediction of pollinator visitation and pollination success, including partial least squares, BayesB, ridge-regression, and random forest. Random forest models obtained high predictive abilities for pollinator visitation frequency, with values of 0.54, 0.52, and 0.66 for honey bee, bumble bee, and total pollinator visits, respectively. The BayesB model provided the most consistent prediction of fruit set, fruit weight, and seed set, with predictive abilities of 0.07, -0.08, and 0.42, respectively. Variable importance analysis revealed that genotypic differences in nectar volume had the greatest impact on honey bee and bumble bee recruitment, although preferences for flower morphological traits varied depending on the foraging task. Flower density was a major driving factor attracting nectar-foraging honey bees and bumble bees, while pollen-foraging bumble bees were most influenced by flower accessibility, specifically corolla length and the length-to-width ratio. Corolla length and the length-to-width ratio were also identified as the main predictors of fruit set, fruit weight, and seed count, suggesting that bumble bees and their foraging preferences may play a pivotal role in fruit production. Moderate to high narrow-sense heritability values (ranging from 0.30 to 0.77) were obtained for all floral traits, indicating that selective breeding efforts may enhance cultivar attractiveness to pollinators.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 23
- FWCI
- 4.77
- Field percentile
- top 4%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Honey bees, Apis mellifera, are important pollinators of the highbush blueberry variety Ventura despite the inability to sonicate
K. Martin, B. Anderson, … M. de Jager·bioRxiv·Feb 16, 2019
- Cross-compatibility of five highbush blueberry varieties and ideal crossing combinations
K. Martin, B. Anderson, … M. de Jager·bioRxiv·Aug 21, 2019
- Assessing the effectiveness of honey bee pollinators for cultivated blueberries in South Africa
K. Martin, B. Anderson, … C. Minnaar·bioRxiv·Sep 3, 2021
- Managed Bee Pollination Enhances Yield and Seed Quality in Brassica napus through Flowering Duration and Agronomic Trait Modulation
Chen Daoyin, li yihuan, … Xiaoling Su·bioRxiv·Apr 15, 2026
- Orchard layout and plant traits influence fruit yield more strongly than pollinator behaviour and density in a dioecious crop
A. Peace, D. Pattermore, … J. Li·bioRxiv·Mar 18, 2020
- Learning to handle flowers increases pollen collection benefits for bees but does not affect pollination success for plants
Maggie M. Mayberry, Katherine C. Naumer, … Avery L. Russell·Behavioral EcologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2024