Improved Estimation of Correlation Accuracy for Machine Learning Brain-Phenotype Associations
Megan T. JonesiD, Ishaan GadiyariD, Xinyu ZhangiD, Kaidi KangiD, Jinyuan LiuiD, Andrew A. CheniD, Jakob SeidlitziD, Aaron F. Alexander‐BlochiD, Edward H. KennedyiD, Simon VandekariD
Abstract
Machine learning is used in neuroscience to examine brain-phenotype associations and facilitate individual prediction from high-dimensional brain imaging. For continuous phenotypes, Pearsons correlation between the observed and predicted phenotype is used to quantify model accuracy in testing data. However, recent research suggests millions of samples may be needed to reliably estimate the maximum achievable predictive accuracy (MAPA). We formally define the MAPA and show that Pearsons estimator is biased for this quantity and its confidence intervals fail to capture the target. We develop a semiparametric (double machine learning) one-step estimator that more accurately estimates the MAPA and yields valid confidence intervals across flexible machine learning settings. Analyzing data from the Reproducible Brain Charts dataset, we show that this estimator has smaller bias when estimating brain-phenotype associations of neuroimaging data with age and psychopathology phenotypes. We show that MAPA for psychopathology factor scores using machine learning models built on structural and functional imaging measures is not better than using demographic and nuisance covariates alone.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Mind the gap: performance metric evaluation in brain-age prediction
Ann‐Marie G. de Lange, Melis Anatürk, … James Howard Cole·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Mar 21, 2022
- Beyond accuracy: Measures for assessing machine learning models, pitfalls and guidelines
Richard Dinga, Brenda W.J.H. Penninx, … André F. Marquand·bioRxiv·Aug 22, 2019
- Comparison of Brain Age Algorithms in Bipolar Disorder
Hui Xin Ng, Lisa T. Eyler·bioRxiv·Nov 20, 2025
- Overlooked features lead to divergent neurobiological interpretations of brain-based machine learning biomarkers
Brendan D. Adkinson, Matthew Rosenblatt, … Dustin Scheinost·bioRxiv·Mar 12, 2025
- Performance reserves in brain-imaging-based phenotype prediction
Marc-André Schulz, Danilo Bzdok, … Kerstin Ritter·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Dec 29, 2023
- Population modeling with machine learning can enhance measures of mental health - Open-Data Replication
Ty O. Easley, Ruiqi Chen, … Janine Diane Bijsterbosch·Neuroimage ReportsPeer-reviewed·Mar 13, 2023