Human MutationGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
AutoPVS1: An automatic classification tool for PVS1 interpretation of null variants
Jiale XiangiD, Jiguang PengiD, Samantha M. BaxteriD, Zhiyu PengiD
Abstract
Null variants are prevalent within human genome, and their accurate interpretation is critical for clinical management. In 2018, the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation (SVI) Working Group refined the only criterion (PVS1) for pathogenicity in the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines. The refinement may improve interpretation consistency, but it also brings hurdles to biocurators because of the complicated workflows and multiple bioinformatics sources required. To address these issues, we developed an automatic classification tool called AutoPVS1 to streamline PVS1 interpretation. We assessed the performance of AutoPVS1 using 56 variants manually curated by ClinGens SVI Working Group and achieved an interpretation concordance of 95% (53/56). A further analysis of 28,586 putative loss-of-function variants by AutoPVS1 demonstrated that at least 27.6% of them do not reach a very strong strength level, with 17.4% based on variant-specific issues and 10.2% on disease mechanism considerations. Moreover, 40.7% (1,918/4,717) of splicing variants were assigned a decreased PVS1 strength level, significantly higher than frameshift and nonsense variants. Our results reinforce the necessity of considering variant-specific issues and disease mechanisms in variant interpretation, and demonstrate that AutoPVS1 is an accurate, reproducible, and reliable tool which facilitates PVS1 interpretation and will thus be of great importance to curators.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-exome sequencing
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 73
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Field percentile
- top 4%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- AutoGVP: a dockerized workflow integrating ClinVar and InterVar germline sequence variant classification
Jung Kim, Ammar S. Naqvi, … Sharon J. Diskin·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 27, 2024
- Recommendations for Interpreting the Loss of Function PVS1 ACMG/AMP Variant Criteria
Ahmad N. Abou Tayoun, Tina F. Pesaran, … ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation Working Group (ClinGen SVI)·Human MutationPeer-reviewed·Sep 7, 2018
- Informing Variant Assessment using Structured Evidence from Prior Classifications (PS1, PM5, and PVS1 Sequence Variant Interpretation Criteria)
Vineel Bhat, Ivan A. Adzhubei, … Christopher A. Cassa·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Oct 28, 2022
- Toward Automatic Variant Interpretation: Discordant Genetic Interpretation Across Variant Annotations for ClinVar Pathogenic Variants
Yuan Chen, Tzu‐Hang Yuan, … Jacob Shujui Hsu·bioRxiv·Oct 11, 2024
- VUSVista: Enhancing the Curation of Variants of Uncertain Significance
Esther Spiteri, Jeanesse Scerri, Jean-Paul Ebejer·bioRxiv·Dec 5, 2025
- Advanced variant classification framework reduces the false positive rate of predicted loss of function (pLoF) variants in population sequencing data
Moriel Singer‐Berk, Sanna Gudmundsson, … Anne O’Donnell‐Luria·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 25, 2023