Effects of continuous tactile stimulation on auditory-evoked cortical responses depend on the audio-tactile phase
Abstract
Auditory perception can benefit from stimuli in non-auditory sensory modalities, as for example in lip-reading. Compared with such visual influences, tactile influences are still poorly understood. It has been shown that single tactile pulses can enhance the perception of auditory stimuli depending on their relative timing, but whether and how such brief auditory enhancements can be stretched in time with more sustained, phase-specific periodic tactile stimulation is still unclear. To address this question, we presented tactile stimulation that fluctuated coherently and continuously at 4Hz with an auditory noise (either in-phase or anti-phase) and assessed its effect on the cortical processing and perception of an auditory signal embedded in that noise. Scalp-electroencephalography recordings revealed an enhancing effect of in-phase tactile stimulation on cortical responses phase-locked to the noise and a suppressive effect of anti-phase tactile stimulation on responses evoked by the auditory signal. Although these effects appeared to follow well-known principles of multisensory integration of discrete audio-tactile events, they were not accompanied by corresponding effects on behavioral measures of auditory signal perception. Our results indicate that continuous periodic tactile stimulation can enhance cortical processing of acoustically-induced fluctuations and mask cortical responses to an ongoing auditory signal. They further suggest that such sustained cortical effects can be insufficient for inducing sustained bottom-up auditory benefits.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 12
- FWCI
- 3.10
- Field percentile
- top 9%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Tactile perception of auditory roughness
Corentin Bernard, Richard Kronland-Martinet, … Etienne Thoret·JASA Express LettersPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2022
- Can you feel what I am saying? Speech-based vibrotactile stimulation enhances the cortical tracking of attended speech in a multi-talker background
Ioana-Sabina Rautu, Mathieu Bourguignon, … Xavier De Tiège·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Neuronal basis of audio-tactile speech perception
Katarzyna Cieśla, Tomasz P. Wolak, Amir Amedi·bioRxiv·Aug 16, 2024
- Feeling the music: Audiotactile encoding of temporal structure in the human brain
Giulio Degano, Ambra Ferrari, Uta Noppeney·bioRxiv·Jan 18, 2026
- Audiotactile stimulation can improve syllable discrimination through multisensory integration in the theta frequency band
Pierre Hieu Guilleminot, Cosima Graef, … Tobias Reichenbach·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2023
- Better ears with eyes open: effects of multisensory stimulation with nonconscious visual stimuli on auditory learning
Milton A. V. Ávila, Rafael Naime Ruggiero, … Cristina Marta Del‐Ben·bioRxiv·Jan 17, 2019