bioRxivScientific Communication & EducationPreprint
Dark citations to Federal resources and their contribution to the public health literature
Abstract
The term "dark citations", which has been previously used to refer to citations of information products outside of traditional peer-reviewed journal articles, is adapted here to refer to those that are not linked to a known indexed identifier and are effectively invisible to traditional bibliometric analysis. We investigate an unexplored source of citations in the biomedical and public health literature by surveying the extent of dark citations across the U.S. government. We systematically focus on public health, quantify their occurrences across the government, and provide a comprehensive dataset for all dark citations within PubMed.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Wikipedia as a gateway to biomedical research: The relative distribution and use of citations in the English Wikipedia
L. A. Maggio, J. Willinsky, … T. Dong·bioRxiv·Jul 18, 2017
- Exploring the relationship between altmetrics and traditional measures of dissemination in health professions education
L. A. Maggio, T. Leroux, … A. R. Artino·bioRxiv·Feb 13, 2018
- Predicting causal citations without full text
T. A. Hoppe, S. Arabi, B. I. Hutchins·bioRxiv·Jul 5, 2022
- Scientific publications and COVID-19 "research pivots" during the pandemic: An initial bibliometric analysis
P. Shapira·bioRxiv·Dec 6, 2020
- Tracking self-citations in academic publishing
A. Kacem, J. W. Flatt, P. Mayr·ScientometricsPeer-reviewed·Mar 18, 2020
- How accurate are citations of frequently cited papers in biomedical literature?
V. Pavlovic, T. Weissgerber, … CITE investigators·bioRxiv·Dec 10, 2020