European Journal of NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Cumulative distribution functions: An alternative approach to examine the triggering of prepared motor actions in the StartReact effect
Aaron N. McInnesiD, Juan M. CastelloteiD, Markus KöfleriD, Claire Fletcher HoneycuttiD, Ottmar V. LippiD, Stephan P. RiekiD, James R. TresilianiD, Welber MarinoviciD
Abstract
There has been much debate concerning whether startling sensory stimuli can activate a fast-neural pathway for movement triggering (StartReact) which is different from that of voluntary movements. Activity in sternocleidomastoid (SCM) electromyogram is suggested to indicate activation of this pathway. We evaluated whether SCM activity can accurately identify trials which may differ in their neurophysiological triggering and assessed the use of cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) of reaction time (RT) data to identify trials with the shortest RTs for analysis. Using recent datasets from the StartReact literature, we examined the relationship between RT and SCM activity. We categorised data into short/longer RT bins using CDFs and used linear mixed effects models to compare potential conclusions that can be drawn when categorising data on the basis of RT versus on the basis of SCM activity. The capacity of SCM to predict RT is task-specific, making it an unreliable indicator of distinct neurophysiological mechanisms. Classification of trials using CDFs is capable of capturing potential task- or muscle-related differences in triggering whilst avoiding the pitfalls of the traditional SCM activity based classification method. We conclude that SCM activity is not always evident on trials that show the early triggering of movements seen in the StartReact phenomenon. We further propose that a more comprehensive analysis of data may be achieved through the inclusion of CDF analyses. These findings have implications for future research investigating movement triggering as well as for potential therapeutic applications of StartReact.
- Citations
- 12
- FWCI
- 0.94
- Field percentile
- top 29%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Triggering mechanisms for motor actions: A mini meta-analysis and experimental data.
Li‐Ann Leow, Aya Uchida, … Welber Marinovic·NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 13, 2018
- Transcranial direct current stimulation of the supplementary motor area modulates behavioral and peripheral electrophysiological measures of motor preparation.
Ashutosh Kumar, Ayusha Desai, … Aditya Murthy·bioRxiv·Oct 31, 2025
- Shoulder muscle recruitment of small amplitude motor units during the delay period encodes a reach movement plan which is sensitive to task context
Satya Rungta, Aditya Murthy·bioRxiv·Feb 9, 2022
- Cortical activation associated with motor preparation can be used to predict the freely chosen effector of an upcoming movement and reflects response time: An fMRI decoding study
Satoshi Hirose, Isao Nambu, Eiichi Naito·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Aug 27, 2018
- Premovement suppression of corticospinal excitability may be a necessary part of movement preparation
Jaime Ibáñez, Ricci Hannah, … John C. Rothwell·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Oct 23, 2019
- The influence of startReact on long-latency reflexive muscle activation during the transition from posture to movement
Claire Fletcher Honeycutt, Vengateswaran J. Ravichandran, Eric Jon Perreault·bioRxiv·Aug 25, 2017