Ottmar V. Lipp

This study examines how urgency affects corticospinal suppression during movement preparation, finding no suppression under high urgency and increased disruption from external events.

The paper examines how movement preparation affects responses to loud acoustic stimuli by analyzing cortical and sub-cortical excitability and reaction times.

The paper investigates how contralateral limb contractions during action preparation enhance motor output facilitation by loud acoustic stimuli, showing greater facilitation with contralateral low-force flexion contractions.

The paper investigates whether preparatory inhibition is obligatory in motor preparation by examining its presence under high urgency conditions using TMS and LAS.

This study examines how loud acoustic stimuli affect voluntary and involuntary responses during movement preparation, finding facilitation of voluntary actions and suppression of involuntary reflexes at specific timepoints.

The paper evaluates the use of cumulative distribution functions to analyze reaction time data in the StartReact effect, finding that SCM activity is unreliable for identifying neurophysiological triggering differences.

The paper examines the relationship between Stop/No-go P300 amplitude and response force on failed inhibitions, finding a continuous correlation that is missed by binary categorization.

The paper meta-analyzes studies on motor action triggering, finding faster premotor reaction times in trials with sternocleidomastoid muscle activity, and presents experimental data on foreperiod predictability effects.