Distortion correction of diffusion weighted MRI without reverse phase-encoding scans or field-maps
K. G. Schilling, J. Blaber, C. Hansen, L. Cai, B. Rogers, A. W. Anderson, S. Smith, P. Kanakaraj, T. Rex, S. M. Resnick, A. T. Shafer, L. Cutting, N. Woodward, D. Zald, B. A. Landman
Abstract
Diffusion magnetic resonance images may suffer from geometric distortions due to susceptibility induced off resonance fields, which cause geometric mismatch with anatomical images and ultimately affect subsequent quantification of microstructural or connectivity indices. State-of-the art diffusion distortion correction methods typically require data acquired with reverse phase encoding directions, resulting in varying magnitudes and orientations of distortion, which allow estimation of an undistorted volume. Alternatively, additional field maps acquisitions can be used along with sequence information to determine warping fields. However, not all imaging protocols include these additional scans and cannot take advantage of state-of-the art distortion correction. To avoid additional acquisitions, structural MRI (undistorted scans) can be used as registration targets for intensity driven correction. In this study, we aim to (1) enable susceptibility distortion correction with historical and/or limited diffusion datasets that do not include specific sequences for distortion correction and (2) avoid the computationally intensive registration procedure typically required for distortion correction using structural scans. To achieve these aims, we use deep learning (3D U-nets) to synthesize an undistorted b0 image that matches geometry of structural T1w images and intensity contrasts from diffusion images. Importantly, the training dataset is heterogenous, consisting of varying acquisitions of both structural and diffusion. We apply our approach to a withheld test set and show that distortions are successfully corrected after processing. We quantitatively evaluate the proposed distortion correction and intensity-based registration against state-of-the-art distortion correction (FSL topup). The results illustrate that the proposed pipeline results in b0 images that are geometrically similar to non-distorted structural images, and more closely match state-of-the-art correction with additional acquisitions. In addition, we show generalizability of the proposed approach to datasets that were not in the original training / validation / testing datasets. These datasets included varying populations, contrasts, resolutions, and magnitudes and orientations of distortion and show efficacious distortion correction. The method is available as a Singularity container, source code, and an executable trained model to facilitate evaluation.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Correction of susceptibility distortion in EPI: a semi-supervised approach with deep learning.
Antoine Legouhy, Mark S. Graham, … Hui Gary Zhang·bioRxiv·Jul 12, 2022
- DACO: Distortion/artefact correction for diffusion MRI data in an integrated framework
Yung‐Chin Hsu, Wen‐Yih Isaac Tseng·bioRxiv·Jul 6, 2021
- Evaluation of six phase encoding based susceptibility distortion correction methods for diffusion MRI
Xuan Gu, Anders Eklund·Frontiers in NeuroinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 5, 2019
- SynBOLD-DisCo: Synthetic BOLD images for distortion correction of fMRI without additional calibration scans
T. Yu, L. Y. Cai, … K. G. Schilling·bioRxiv·Sep 13, 2022
- Advancing High-Resolution 7T Diffusion MRI: Evaluating Phase-Encoding Correction Strategies for Distortion Correction from Basic to Four-Way Acquisitions
Kurt G. Schilling, Alexander J. S. Beckett, … An T. Vu·Magnetic Resonance ImagingPeer-reviewed·Apr 17, 2026
- dStripe: slice artefact correction in diffusion MRI via constrained neural network
Maximilian Pietsch, Daan Christiaens, … Jacques‐Donald Tournier·Medical Image AnalysisPeer-reviewed·Sep 27, 2021