henhaobio
Sign in

Molecular Ecology ResourcesGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article

Parent-offspring inference in inbred populations

Jan‐Niklas RungeiD, Barbara KönigiD, Anna K. LindholmiD, Andrés BendeskyiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Genealogical relationships are fundamental components of genetic studies. However, it is often challenging to infer correct and complete pedigrees even when genome-wide information is available. For example, inbreeding can obfuscate genetic differences between individuals, making it difficult to even distinguish first-degree relatives such as parent-offspring from full siblings. Similarly, genotyping errors can interfere with the detection of genetic similarity between parents and their offspring. Inbreeding is common in natural, domesticated, and experimental populations and genotyping of these populations often has more errors than in human datasets, so efficient methods for building pedigrees under these conditions are necessary. Here, we present a new method for parent-offspring inference in inbred pedigrees called SPORE (Specific Parent-Offspring Relationship Estimation). SPORE is vastly superior to existing pedigree-inference methods at detecting parent-offspring relationships, in particular when inbreeding is high or in the presence of genotyping errors, or both. SPORE therefore fills an important void in the arsenal of pedigree inference tools. Author SummaryKnowing the genealogical relationships among individuals is critical for genetic analyses, such as for identifying the mutations that cause diseases or that contribute to valuable agricultural traits such as milk production. Although many tools exist for establishing pedigrees using genetic information, these tools fail when individuals are highly inbred, such as in domesticated animals, or in groups of people in which consanguineous matings are common. Furthermore, existing tools do not work well when genetic information has errors at levels observed in modern datasets. Here, we present a novel approach to solve these problems. Our method is significantly more accurate than existing tools and more tolerant of errors in the genetic data. We expect that our method, which is simple to use and computationally efficient, will be a useful tool in a diversity of settings, from the studies of human and natural populations, to agricultural and experimental settings.

Citations
2
FWCI
0.30
Field percentile
top 49%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISKo '17Jewett '21Williams '25Dodds '19Ellis '24Ramstetter '17
64% semantic matchGenetics
Amy Ko, Rasmus Nielsen·PLoS Genetics·Aug 21, 2017· 27 citations