The American Journal of Human GeneticsGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Geographic variation and bias in polygenic scores of complex diseases and traits in Finland
Sini KermineniD, Alicia R. MartiniD, Jukka T. KoskelaiD, Sanni RuotsalaineniD, Aki Samuli HavulinnaiD, Ida L. SurakkaiD, Aarno V. PalotieiD, Markus PerolaiD, Veikko V SalomaaiD, Mark J. DalyiD, Samuli RipattiiD, Matti PirineniD
Abstract
Polygenic scores (PS) are becoming a useful tool to identify individuals with high genetic risk for complex diseases and several projects are currently testing their utility for translational applications. It is also tempting to use PS to assess whether genetic variation can explain a part of the geographic distribution of a phenotype. However, it is not well known how population genetic properties of the training and target samples affect the geographic distribution of PS. Here, we evaluate geographic differences, and related biases, of PS in Finland with geographically well-defined sample of 2,376 individuals from the National FINRISK study. First, we detect geographic differences in PS for coronary artery disease (CAD), rheumatoid arthritis, schizophrenia, waits-hip ratio (WHR), body-mass index (BMI) and height, but not for Crohns disease or ulcerative colitis. Second, we use height as a model trait to thoroughly assess the possible population genetic biases in PS and apply similar approaches to the other phenotypes. Most importantly, we detect suspiciously large accumulation of geographic differences for CAD, WHR, BMI and height, suggesting bias arising from population genetic structure rather than from a direct genotype-phenotype association. This work demonstrates how sensitive the geographic patterns of current PS are for small biases even within relatively homogenous populations and provides simple tools to identify such biases. A thorough understanding of the effects of population genetic structure on PS is essential for translational applications of PS.
- organism: human
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: polygenic risk
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 115
- FWCI
- 11.26
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- High-resolution portability of 245 polygenic scores when derived and applied in the same cohort
F. Prive, H. Aschard, … B. J. Vilhjalmsson·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- Incorporating family history of disease improves polygenic risk scores in diverse populations
Margaux L.A. Hujoel, Po‐Ru Loh, … Alkes L. Price·Cell GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2022
- Polygenic scoring accuracy varies across the genetic ancestry continuum in all human populations
Yi Ding, Kangcheng Hou, … Bogdan Paşaniuc·bioRxiv·Sep 28, 2022
- Putting Polygenic Scores in Context: How Intersectional Factors Affect Relative and Absolute Genetic Risk
Mihael Cudic, Justin D. Tubbs, … Jordan W. Smoller·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 13, 2026
- Analysis of Polygenic Score Usage and Performance in Diverse Human Populations
Laramie E. Duncan, Hanyang Shen, … Benjamin W. Domingue·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jul 25, 2019
- Testing for differences in polygenic scores in the presence of confounding
Jennifer Blanc, Jeremy J. Berg·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 15, 2025