Dynamic networks of fighting and mating in a wild cricket population
Abstract
Reproductive success is often highly skewed in animal populations. Yet the processes leading to this are not always clear. Similarly, connections in animal social networks are often non-randomly distributed, with some individuals with many connections and others with few, yet whether there are simple explanations for this pattern has not been determined. Numerous social interactions involve dyads embedded within a wider network. As a result, it may be possible to model which individuals accumulate social interaction through a more general understanding of the social networks structure, and how this structure changes over time. We analysed fighting and mating interactions across the breeding season in a population of wild field crickets under surveillance from a network of video cameras. We fitted stochastic actor-oriented models to determine the dynamic process by which networks of cricket fighting and mating interactions form, and how they co-influence each other. We found crickets tended to fight those in close spatial proximity to them, and those possessing a mutual connection in the fighting network, and heavier crickets fought more often. We also found that crickets who mate with many others tended to fight less in the following time period. This demonstrates that a mixture of spatial constraints, characteristics of individuals and characteristics of the immediate social environment are key for determining social interactions. The mating interaction network required very few parameters to understand its growth and so structure; only homophily by mating success was required to simulate the skew of mating interactions seen in this population. This demonstrates that relatively simple, but dynamic processes can give highly skewed distributions of mating success.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Reciprocal social ties drive stability within a social network
R. Dakin, P. Clunis, … T. B. Ryder·bioRxiv·Nov 6, 2020
- Dynamic network partnerships and social contagion drive cooperation
R. Dakin, T. B. Ryder·bioRxiv·Nov 6, 2018
- Sex differences in alternative reproductive tactics in response to predation risk in tree crickets
V. R. Torsekar, R. Balakrishnan·bioRxiv·Nov 20, 2019
- The effect of sociality on competitive interactions among birds
I. Berberi, E. T. Miller, R. Dakin·bioRxiv·May 9, 2022
- Reciprocity and behavioral heterogeneity govern the stability of social networks
R. Dakin, T. B. Ryder·bioRxiv·Nov 17, 2019
- Density-dependent costs and benefits of male mating success in a wild insect
P. T. Niemela, S. Tiso, N. J. Dingemanse·bioRxiv·Aug 14, 2019