Quantifying the contribution of recessive coding variation to developmental disorders
Hilary C. MartiniD, Wendy D. JonesiD, Rebecca E. McIntyreiD, Gabriela Sánchez-AndradeiD, Mark Sanderson, James D. StephensoniD, Carla P. JonesiD, Juliet HandsakeriD, Giuseppe GalloneiD, Michaela Bianka BruntraegeriD, Jeremy F. McRaeiD, Elena PrigmoreiD, Patrick ShortiD, Mari NiemiiD, Joanna KaplanisiD, Elizabeth J. RadfordiD, Nadia A. AkawiiD, Meena BalasubramanianiD, John DeaniD, Rachel Helen HortoniD, Alice Hulbert, Diana S. JohnsoniD, Katie E. JohnsoniD, Dhavendra Kumar, Sally Ann LynchiD, , on behalf of the Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study
Abstract
Large exome-sequencing datasets offer an unprecedented opportunity to understand the genetic architecture of rare diseases, informing clinical genetics counseling and optimal study designs for disease gene identification. We analyzed 7,448 exome-sequenced families from the Deciphering Developmental Disorders study, and, for the first time, estimated the causal contribution of recessive coding variation exome-wide. We found that the proportion of cases attributable to recessive coding variants is surprisingly low in patients of European ancestry, at only 3.6%, versus 50% of cases explained by de novo coding mutations. Surprisingly, we found that, even in European probands with affected siblings, recessive coding variants are only likely to explain ~12% of cases. In contrast, they account for 31% of probands with Pakistani ancestry due to elevated autozygosity. We tested every gene for an excess of damaging homozygous or compound heterozygous genotypes and found three genes that passed stringent Bonferroni correction: EIF3F, KDM5B, and THOC6. EIF3F is a novel disease gene, and KDM5B has previously been reported as a dominant disease gene. KDM5B appears to follow a complex mode of inheritance, in which heterozygous loss-of-function variants (LoFs) show incomplete penetrance and biallelic LoFs are fully penetrant. Our results suggest that a large proportion of undiagnosed developmental disorders remain to be explained by other factors, such as noncoding variants and polygenic risk.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 200
- FWCI
- 15.18
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Federated analysis of the contribution of recessive coding variants to 29,745 developmental disorder patients from diverse populations
V. Kartik Chundru, Zhancheng Zhang, … Hilary C. Martin·medRxiv·Jul 24, 2023
- Substantial role of rare inherited variation in individuals with developmental disorders
Kaitlin E. Samocha, V. Kartik Chundru, … Matthew E. Hurles·medRxiv·Aug 28, 2024
- Genomic profiling of 553 uncharacterized neurodevelopment patients reveals a high proportion of recessive pathogenic variant carriers in an outbred population
Youngha Lee, Soojin Park, … Jong‐Hee Chae·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jan 29, 2020
- Non-coding variants are a rare cause of recessive developmental disorders in trans with coding variants
Jenny Lord, Carolina Jaramillo Oquendo, … Nicola Whiffin·medRxiv·Jun 23, 2023
- Prevalence, phenotype and architecture of developmental disorders caused by de novo mutation
Jeremy F. McRae, Stephen Clayton, … Neeti Ghali·bioRxiv·Mar 7, 2019
- The landscape of autosomal-recessive pathogenic variants in European populations reveals phenotype-specific effects
Hila Fridman, Helger G. Yntema, … Han G. Brunner·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 18, 2021