Federated analysis of the contribution of recessive coding variants to 29,745 developmental disorder patients from diverse populations
V. Kartik ChundruiD, Zhancheng ZhangiD, Klaudia WalteriD, Sarah LindsayiD, Petr DanecekiD, Ruth Y. EberhardtiD, Eugene J. GardneriD, Daniel Shiloh MalawskyiD, Emilie M. WigdoriD, Rebecca I. ToreneiD, Kyle RettereriD, Caroline Fiona WrightiD, Kirsty M. McWalteriD, Eamonn G. SheridaniD, Helen V. FirthiD, Matthew E. HurlesiD, Kaitlin E. SamochaiD, Vincent D. UstachiD, Hilary C. MartiniD
Abstract
Autosomal recessive (AR) coding variants are a well-known cause of rare disorders. We quantified the contribution of these variants to developmental disorders (DDs) in the largest and most ancestrally diverse sample to date, comprising 29,745 trios from the Deciphering Developmental Disorders (DDD) study and the genetic diagnostics company GeneDx, of whom 20.4% have genetically-inferred non-European ancestries. The estimated fraction of patients attributable to exome-wide AR coding variants ranged from [~]2% to [~]18% across genetically-inferred ancestry groups, and was significantly correlated with the average autozygosity (r=0.99, p=5x10-6). Established AR DD-associated (ARDD) genes explained 90% of the total AR coding burden, and this was not significantly different between probands with genetically-inferred European versus non-European ancestries. Approximately half the burden in these established genes was explained by variants not already reported as pathogenic in ClinVar. We estimated that [~]1% of undiagnosed patients in both cohorts were attributable to damaging biallelic genotypes involving missense variants in established ARDD genes, highlighting the challenge in interpreting these. By testing for gene-specific enrichment of damaging biallelic genotypes, we identified two novel ARDD genes passing Bonferroni correction, KBTBD2 (p=1x10-7) and CRELD1 (p=9x10-8). Several other novel or recently-reported candidate genes were identified at a more lenient 5% false-discovery rate, including ZDHHC16 and HECTD4. This study expands our understanding of the genetic architecture of DDs across diverse genetically-inferred ancestry groups and suggests that improving strategies for interpreting missense variants in known ARDD genes may allow us to diagnose more patients than discovering the remaining genes.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Quantifying the contribution of recessive coding variation to developmental disorders
Hilary C. Martin, Wendy D. Jones, … on behalf of the Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study·SciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 8, 2018
- Substantial role of rare inherited variation in individuals with developmental disorders
Kaitlin E. Samocha, V. Kartik Chundru, … Matthew E. Hurles·medRxiv·Aug 28, 2024
- Non-coding variants are a rare cause of recessive developmental disorders in trans with coding variants
Jenny Lord, Carolina Jaramillo Oquendo, … Nicola Whiffin·medRxiv·Jun 23, 2023
- The landscape of autosomal-recessive pathogenic variants in European populations reveals phenotype-specific effects
Hila Fridman, Helger G. Yntema, … Han G. Brunner·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 18, 2021
- Genomic profiling of 553 uncharacterized neurodevelopment patients reveals a high proportion of recessive pathogenic variant carriers in an outbred population
Youngha Lee, Soojin Park, … Jong‐Hee Chae·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jan 29, 2020
- Autism spectrum disorder trios from consanguineous populations are enriched for rare biallelic variants, identifying 32 new candidate genes
Ricardo Harripaul, Ansa Rabia, … John B. Vincent·medRxiv·Dec 24, 2021