Fine Tuning Rigid Body Docking Results Using the Dreiding Force Field: A Computational Study of 36 Known Nanobody-Protein Complexes
Abstract
This paper aims to understand the binding strategies of a nanobody-protein pair by studying known complexes. Rigid body protein-ligand docking programs produce several complexes, called decoys, which are good candidates with high scores of shape complementarity, electrostatic interactions, desolvation, buried surface area, and Lennard-Jones potentials. It is not known which decoy represents the true structure. We studied thirty-seven nanobody-protein complexes from the Single Domain Antibody Database, sd-Ab DB, http://www.sdab-db.ca/. For each structure, a large number of decoys are generated using the Fast Fourier Transform algorithm of the software ZDOCK. The decoys were ranked according to their target protein-nanobody interaction energies, calculated by using the Dreiding Force Field, with rank 1 having the lowest interaction energy. Out of thirty-six PDB structures, twenty-five true structures were predicted as rank 1. Eleven of the remaining structures required [A]ngstrom size rigid body translations of the nanobody relative to the protein to match the given PDB structure. After the translation the Dreiding interaction (DI) energies of all complexes decreased and became rank 1. In one case, rigid body rotations as well as translations of the nanobody were required for matching the crystal structure. We used a Monte Carlo algorithm that randomly translates and rotates the nanobody of a decoy and calculates the DI energy. Results show that rigid body translations and the DI energy are sufficient for determining the correct binding location and pose of ZDOCK created decoys. A survey of the sd-Ab DB showed that each nanobody makes at least one salt bridge with its partner protein, indicating that salt bridge formation is an essential strategy in nanobody-protein recognition. Based on the analysis of the thirty-six crystal structures and evidence from existing literature, we propose a set of principles that could be used in the design of nanobodies.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 0.36
- Field percentile
- 48th percentile
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Re-ranking of computational protein-peptide docking solutions with amino acid profiles of rigid-body docking results
Masahito Ohue·Transactions on computational science and computational intelligencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2021
- Combining AI structure prediction and integrative modelling for nanobody-antigen complexes
Miguel Sánchez-Marín, Marco Giulini, Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin·bioRxiv·Jul 1, 2025
- Efficient Flexible Backbone Protein-Protein Docking for Challenging Targets
N. A. Marze, S. S. Roy Burman, … J. J. Gray·bioRxiv·Nov 22, 2017
- Disulphide and sequence-encoded conformational priors guide nanobody structure prediction
Montader Ali, Mateusz Jaskółowski, … Pietro Sormanni·bioRxiv·Feb 13, 2026
- ModiBodies: A computational method for modifying nanobodies to improve their antigen binding affinity and specificity
A. Hacisuleyman, B. Erman·bioRxiv·Oct 28, 2019
- FlexAID: Revisiting docking on non native-complex structures
Francis Gaudreault, Rafael Najmanovich·Journal of Chemical Information and ModelingPeer-reviewed·Jul 27, 2015