Theoretical and Applied ErgonomicsBioengineeringPeer-reviewed journal article
The Effects of Vibrotactile Stimulation of the Upper Extremity on Sensation and Perception
Abeer Abdel KhaleqiD, Yash More, Brody Skaufel, Mazen Al BornoiD
Abstract
Vibrotactile stimulation has applications in a variety of fields, including medicine, virtual reality, and human-computer interaction. Eccentric Rotating Mass (ERM) vibrating motors are widely used in wearable haptic devices for their small size, low cost, and low energy features. The effect of ERM motor vibrations on upper extremity sensation and perception have not been thoroughly studied previously, which is important to design better wearable haptic devices. We conducted experiments with vibrotactile stimulation on 15 healthy participants. Eight motors were placed on a consistent set of muscles on the upper extremity and one motor was placed on the index finger. We found a significant correlation between voltage and sensation intensity (r=0.39). However, we did not find a significant aggregate-level correlation on the perceived pleasantness of the simulation. The sensation intensity varied based on the location of the vibration on the upper extremity (with the lowest intensity on the triceps brachii and brachialis) and slightly decreased (5.9 {+/-} 2.9 %) when participants performed reaching movements. When a single motor was vibrating, the participants accuracy at identifying the motor without visual feedback increased as voltage increased, reaching up to 81.4 {+/-} 14.2 %. When we stimulated three muscles simultaneously, we found that most participants were able to identify only two out of three vibrating motors (41.7 {+/-} 32.3 %). Our findings can help tune stimulation parameters in human- machine interaction applications.
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 20th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Vibrotactile stimulation on the upper back requires stronger vibration during goal-directed reaching but does not impede reaching performance
Alice Elizabeth Atkin, Bernard Marius ’t Hart, … Denise Y. P. Henriques·bioRxiv·Oct 18, 2026
- Spatial and Temporal Influences on Discrimination of Vibrotactile Stimuli on The Arm
Valay A. Shah, Maura Casadio, … Leigh Ann Mrotek·Experimental Brain ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jun 7, 2019
- Waveform-dependent mechanical signatures shape human vibrotactile perception
Sarah Bonnet, Roger Holmes Watkins, … Rochelle Ackerley·bioRxiv·Nov 10, 2025
- Comparison of vibrotactile and joint-torque feedback in a myoelectric upper-limb prosthesis
- Temporal Phase Differences Encode Tactile Motion from Static Vibrotactile Inputs
Erfan Rezaei, Mehdi Adibi·bioRxiv·May 19, 2026
- Fatiguing Effects of Indirect Vibration Stimulation in Upper Limb Muscles- pre, post and during Isometric Contractions Superimposed on Upper Limb Vibration
A. N. Pujari, R. D. Neilson, M. Cardinale·bioRxiv·Sep 28, 2018