bioRxivBioengineering
Comparison of vibrotactile and joint-torque feedback in a myoelectric upper-limb prosthesis
Abstract
BackgroundDespite the technological advancements in myoelectric prostheses, body-powered prostheses remain a popular choice for amputees, in part due to the natural sensory advantage they provide. Research on haptic feedback in myoelectric prostheses has delivered mixed results. Furthermore, there is limited research comparing various haptic feedback modalities in myoelectric prostheses. In this paper, we present a comparison of the feedback intrinsically present in body-powered prostheses (joint-torque feedback) to a commonly proposed feedback modality for myoelectric prostheses (vibrotactile feedback). In so doing, we seek to understand whether the advantages of kinesthetic feedback present in body-powered prostheses translate to myoelectric prostheses, and whether there are differences between kinesthetic and cutaneous feedback in prosthetic applications.\n\nMethodsWe developed an experimental testbed that features a cable-driven, voluntary-closing 1-DoF prosthesis, a capstan-driven elbow exoskeleton, and a vibrotactile actuation unit. The system can present grip force to users as either a flexion moment about the elbow or vibration on the wrist. To provide an equal comparison of joint-torque and vibrotactile feedback, a stimulus intensity matching scheme was utilized. Non-amputee participants (n=12) were asked to discriminate objects of varying stiffness with the prosthesis in three conditions: no haptic feedback, vibrotactile feedback, and joint-torque feedback.\n\nResultsResults indicate that haptic feedback increased discrimination accuracy over no haptic feedback, but the difference between joint-torque feedback and vibrotactile feedback was not significant. In addition, our results highlight nuanced differences in performance depending on the objects stiffness, and suggest that participants likely pay less attention to incidental cues with the addition of haptic feedback.\n\nConclusionEven when haptic feedback is not modality matched to the task, such as in the case of vibrotactile feedback, performance with a myoelectric prosthesis can improve significantly. This implies it is possible to achieve the same benefits with vibrotactile feedback, which is cheaper and easier to implement than other forms of feedback.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A closed-loop hand prosthesis with simultaneous intraneural tactile and position feedback
Edoardo D’Anna, Giacomo Valle, … Silvestro Micera·Science RoboticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 20, 2019
- Artificial Joint Speed Feedback for Myoelectric Prosthesis Control
Eric J. Earley, Reva E. Johnson, … Levi J. Hargrove·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Mar 4, 2021
- Audible Feedback Improves Internal Model Strength and Performance of Myoelectric Prosthesis Control
A. W. Shehata, E. J. Scheme, J. W. Sensinger·bioRxiv·May 21, 2018
- Successful transfer of myoelectric skill from virtual interface to prosthesis control
Sigrid S. G. Dupan, Simon A. Stuttaford, Dyson M·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2025
- Optimizing Electrotactile Stimulation Parameters for Responses Under Cognitive Load
Felix Jarto, Elaine Corbett, Sigrid S. G. Dupan·bioRxiv·Sep 8, 2025
- The crossmodal congruency task as a measure of intuitiveness of sensory feedback in the lower limb
Rohit Bose, Bailey A. Petersen, … Lee E. Fisher·bioRxiv·Aug 10, 2026