Learning Place Cells and Remapping by Decoding the Cognitive Map
Markus Borud PetterseniD, Vemund Sigmundson SchøyeniD, Anders Malthe‐SørensseniD, Mikkel Elle LepperødiD
Abstract
Hippocampal place cells are known for their spatially selective firing and are believed to encode an animals location while forming part of a cognitive map of space. These cells exhibit marked tuning curve and rate changes when an animals environment is sufficiently manipulated, in a process known as remapping. Place cells are accompanied by many other spatially tuned cells such as border cells and grid cells, but how these cells interact during navigation and remapping is unknown. In this work, we build a normative place cell model wherein a neural network is tasked with accurate position reconstruction and path integration. Motivated by the notion of a cognitive map, the networks position is estimated directly from its learned representations. To obtain a position estimate, we propose a non-trainable decoding scheme applied to network output units, inspired by the localized firing patterns of place cells. We find that output units learn place-like spatial representations, while upstream recurrent units become boundary-tuned. When the network is trained to perform the same task in multiple simulated environments, its place-like units learn to remap like biological place cells, displaying global, geometric and rate remapping. These remapping abilities appear to be supported by rate changes in upstream units. While the model does not learn grid-like units, its place unit centers form clusters organized in a hexagonal lattice in open fields. When we decode the center locations of CA1 place fields in mice, we find preliminary evidence of a similar clustering tendency. This suggests a potential mechanism for the interaction between place cells, border cells, and grid cells. Our model provides a normative framework for learning spatial representations previously reserved for biological place cells, providing new insight into place cell field formation and remapping.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 7
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A Memory Model of Rodent Spatial Navigation: Place Cells are Memories Arranged in a Grid and Grid Cells are Non-spatial
David E. Huber·bioRxiv·Dec 30, 2023
- Learning Conjunctive Representations
Markus Borud Pettersen, Frederik Sebastian Rogge, Mikkel Elle Lepperød·bioRxiv·May 30, 2024
- Hippocampal place cells encode global location but not changes in environmental connectivity in a 4-room navigation task
Éléonore Duvelle, Roddy M. Grieves, … Hugo J. Spiers·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 15, 2021
- Learning an efficient hippocampal place map from entorhinal inputs using non-negative sparse coding
Yanbo Lian, Anthony Neville Burkitt·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Jun 23, 2021
- Experience dependent contextual codes in the hippocampus
Mark H. Plitt, Lisa Marie Giocomo·Nature NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Mar 22, 2021
- When and Where: A Model Hippocampal Network Unifies Formation of Time Cells and Place Cells
Qiaorong S Yu, Zhaoze Wang, Vijay Balasubramanian·bioRxiv·Mar 22, 2026