Evolutionary and ecological processes influencing chemical defense variation in an aposematic and mimetic Heliconius butterfly
A. L. K. Mattila, C. D. Jiggins, O. H. Opedal, G. Montejo-Kovacevich, E. de Castro, W. O. McMillan, C. Bacquet, M. Saastamoinen
Abstract
Chemical defences against predators underlie the evolution of aposematic coloration and mimicry, which are classic examples of adaptive evolution. Surprisingly little is known about the roles of ecological and evolutionary processes maintaining defence variation, and how they may feedback to shape the evolutionary dynamics of species. Cyanogenic Heliconius butterflies exhibit diverse warning color patterns and mimicry, thus providing a useful framework for investigating these questions. We studied intraspecific variation in de novo biosynthesized cyanogenic toxicity and its potential ecological and evolutionary sources in wild populations of Heliconius erato along environmental gradients, in common-garden broods and with feeding treatments. Our results demonstrate substantial intraspecific variation, including detectable variation among broods reared in a common garden. The latter estimate suggests considerable evolutionary potential in this trait, although predicting the response to selection is likely complicated due to the observed skewed distribution of toxicity values and the signatures of maternal contributions to the inheritance of toxicity. Larval diet contributed little to toxicity variation. Furthermore, toxicity profiles were similar along steep rainfall and altitudinal gradients, providing little evidence for these factors explaining variation in biosynthesized toxicity in natural populations. In contrast, there were striking differences in the chemical profiles of H. erato from geographically distant populations, implying potential local adaptation in the acquisition mechanisms and levels of defensive compounds. The results highlight the extensive variation and potential for adaptive evolution in defense traits for aposematic and mimetic species, which may contribute to the high diversity often found in these systems.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Phylogeny not mimicry drives chemical variation in tropical aposematic butterflies
R. Blow, S. Ehlers, … C. Jiggins·bioRxiv·Dec 22, 2023
- Phenotypic plasticity in chemical defence allows butterflies to diversify host use strategies
E. C. P. de Castro, J. Musgrove, … C. D. Jiggins·bioRxiv·Apr 7, 2020
- Species specificity and intraspecific variation in the chemical profiles of Heliconius butterflies across a large geographic range
K. Darragh, G. Montejo-Kovacevich, … C. D. Jiggins·bioRxiv·Sep 23, 2019
- A field test for frequency-dependent selection on mimetic colour patterns in Heliconius butterflies
Patricio A. Salazar, Martin Stevens, … Chris D. Jiggins·bioRxiv·Jun 2, 2014
- Toxin structure shapes palatability in a chemically defended butterfly
Erik Todd, Aaron Denton, … Érika C. Pinheiro de Castro·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2026
- Experimental manipulation of Heliconius warning patterns reduces harassment of previously mated females.
Richard M. Merrill, Sara Neggazi, … W. Owen McMillan·bioRxiv·Oct 7, 2018