bioRxivBioengineeringPreprint
A new causality measure
Abstract
Let there are n i.i.d observations, each producing a two tuple of real values (xi, yi), i [isin] {1,......, n} giving rise to random variables X = (x1,..., xn) and Y = (y1,..., yn). What is the statistical significance of the hypothesis that an increase in the independent variable X is causing an increase (or decrease) to the dependent variable Y ?
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Explanation implies causation?
Leslie Myint, Jeffrey T. Leek, Leah R. Jager·bioRxiv·Nov 13, 2017
- Correlation Detection with and without the Theories of Conditionals: A model update of Hattori & Oaksford (2007)
T. Takahashi, K. Oyo, … K. Higuchi·bioRxiv·Nov 19, 2019
- Partitioning covariance into causal and spurious components
Jonathan M. Henshaw·bioRxiv·Oct 2, 2026
- Measuring Granger-causal effects in multivariate time series by system editing
Roberto Domingo Pascual-Marqui, R. Biscay, … Masafumi Yoshimura·bioRxiv·Dec 30, 2018
- qad: An R-package to detect asymmetric and directed dependence in bivariate samples
F. Griessenberger, W. Trutschnig, R. R. Junker·bioRxiv·Mar 25, 2022
- QCAT: testing causality of variants using only summary association statistics
Donghyung Lee, T. Bernard Bigdeli, … Silviu-Alin Bacanu·bioRxiv·Aug 31, 2016