Highly Efficient Hypothesis Testing Methods for Regression-type Tests with Correlated Observations and Heterogeneous Variance Structure
Yun ZhangiD, Gautam Kumar BandyopadhyayiD, David J. TophamiD, Ann Regina FalseyiD, Xing QiuiD
Abstract
BackgroundFor many practical hypothesis testing (H-T) applications, the data are correlated and/or with heterogeneous variance structure. The regression t-test for weighted linear mixed-effects regression (LMER) is a legitimate choice because it accounts for complex covariance structure; however, high computational costs and occasional convergence issues make it impractical for analyzing high-throughput data. In this paper, we propose computationally efficient parametric and semiparametric tests based on a set of specialized matrix techniques dubbed as the PB-transformation. The PB-transformation has two advantages: 1. The PB-transformed data will have a scalar variance-covariance matrix. 2. The original H-T problem will be reduced to an equivalent one-sample H-T problem. The transformed problem can then be approached by either the one-sample Students t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test. ResultsIn simulation studies, the proposed methods outperform commonly used alternative methods under both normal and double exponential distributions. In particular, the PB-transformed t-test produces notably better results than the weighted LMER test, especially in the high correlation case, using only a small fraction of computational cost (3 versus 933 seconds). We apply these two methods to a set of RNA-seq gene expression data collected in a breast cancer study. Pathway analyses show that the PB-transformed t-test reveals more biologically relevant findings in relation to breast cancer than the weighted LMER test.. ConclusionsAs fast and numerically stable replacements for the weighted LMER test, the PB-transformed tests are especially suitable for "messy" high-throughput data that include both independent and matched/repeated samples. By using our method, the practitioners no longer have to choose between using partial data (applying paired tests to only the matched samples) or ignoring the correlation in the data (applying two sample tests to data with some correlated samples).
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.39
- Field percentile
- top 39%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Test-statistic correlation and data-row correlation
Bin Zhuo, Duo Jiang, Yanming Di·Statistics & Probability LettersPeer-reviewed·Aug 14, 2020
- Combining Dependent P-values with an Empirical Adaptation of Brown’s Method
William Poole, David L. Gibbs, … Theo Knijnenburg·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 29, 2016
- The harmonic mean p-value for combining dependent tests
Daniel J. Wilson·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jan 4, 2019
- Data-driven hypothesis weighting increases detection power in multiple testing
Nikolaos Ignatiadis, Bernd Klaus, … Wolfgang Huber·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·May 30, 2016
- Novel Data Transformations for RNA-seq Data Analysis
Zeyu Zhang, Danyang Yu, … Weiliang Qiu·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Mar 18, 2019
- Priors, population sizes, and power in genome-wide hypothesis tests
Jitong Cai, Jianan Zhan, … Joel S. Bader·bioRxiv·Jul 29, 2021