The contribution of mitochondrial metagenomics to largescale data mining and phylogenetic analysis of Coleoptera
B. Linard, A. Crampton-Platt, J. Moriniere, M. J. Timmermans, C. Andujar, P. Arribas, K. E. Miller, J. Lipecki, E. Favreau, A. Hunter, C. Gomez-Rodriguez, C. Barton, R. Nie, C. P. Gillett, T. Breeschoten, L. Bocak, A. P. Vogler
Abstract
A phylogenetic tree at the species level is still far off for highly diverse insect orders, including the Coleoptera, but the taxonomic breadth of public sequence databases is growing. In addition, new types of data may contribute to increasing taxon coverage, such as metagenomic shotgun sequencing for assembly of mitogenomes from bulk specimen samples. The current study explores the application of these techniques for large-scale efforts to build the tree of Coleoptera. We used shotgun data from 17 different ecological and taxonomic datasets (5 unpublished) to assemble a total of 1942 mitogenome contigs of >3000 bp. These sequences were combined into a single dataset together with all mitochondrial data available at GenBank, in addition to nuclear markers widely used in molecular phylogenetics. The resulting matrix of nearly 16000 species with two or more loci produced trees (RAxML) showing overall congruence with the Linnaean taxonomy at hierarchical levels from suborders to genera. We tested the role of full-length mitogenomes in stabilizing the tree from GenBank data, as mitogenomes might link terminals with non-overlapping gene representation. However, the mitogenome data were only partly useful in this respect, presumably because of the purely automated approach to assembly and gene delimitation, but improvements in future may be possible by using multiple assemblers and manual curation. In conclusion, the combination of data mining and metagenomic sequencing of bulk samples provided the largest phylogenetic tree of Coleoptera to date, which represents a summary of existing phylogenetic knowledge and a defensible tree of great utility, in particular for studies at the intra-familial level, despite some shortcomings for resolving basal nodes.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Bioinformatics of combined nuclear and mitochondrial phylogenomics to define key nodes for the classification of Coleoptera
Thomas J. Creedy, Yinhuan Ding, … Alfried P. Vogler·Systematic BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 5, 2025
- The unresolved phylogenomic tree of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera): assessing the potential causes and consequences
J. Rota, V. G. Twort, … N. Wahlberg·bioRxiv·Apr 9, 2021
- Phylogenomics reveals the relationships of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera): providing the potential landscape using universal single copy orthologues
Q. Chen, M. Deng, … G.-H. Huang·bioRxiv·Oct 14, 2022
- Using mitochondrial genomes to infer phylogenetic relationships among the oldest extant winged insects (Palaeoptera)
Sereina Rutschmann, Ping Chen, … Michael T. Monaghan·bioRxiv·Aug 22, 2017
- A complete time-calibrated multi-gene phylogeny of the European butterflies
M. Wiemers, N. Chazot, … N. Wahlberg·bioRxiv·Nov 16, 2019
- Dissecting phylogenetic signal and accounting for bias in whole-genome data sets: a case study of the Metazoa
Marek L Borowiec, Ernest K Lee, … David C Plachetzki·bioRxiv·Jan 20, 2015