Open Research EuropeNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Local brain-state dependency of effective connectivity: evidence from TMS-EEG
Ida GranöiD, Tuomas P. MutaneniD, Aino E. Tervo, Jaakko O. NiemineniD, Victor Hugo SouzaiD, Matteo FecchioiD, Mario RosanovaiD, Pantelis LioumisiD, Risto Juhani IlmoniemiiD
Abstract
BackgroundSpontaneous cortical oscillations have been shown to modulate cortical responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). If not controlled for, they might increase variability in responses and mask meaningful changes in the signals of interest when studying the brain with TMS combined with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG). To address this challenge in future closed-loop stimulation paradigms, we need to understand how spontaneous oscillations affect TMS-evoked responses. ObjectiveTo describe the effect of the pre-stimulus phase of cortical mu (8-13 Hz) and beta (13-30 Hz) oscillations on TMS-induced effective connectivity patterns. MethodsWe applied TMS to the left primary motor cortex and right pre-supplementary motor area of three subjects while recording EEG. We classified trials off-line into positive- and negative-phase classes according to the mu and beta rhythms. We calculated differences in the global mean-field amplitude (GMFA) and compared the cortical spreading of the TMS-evoked activity between the two classes. ResultsPhase had significant effects on the GMFA in 11 out of 12 datasets (3 subjects x 2 stimulation sites x 2 frequency bands). Seven of the datasets showed significant differences in the time range 15-50 ms, nine in 50-150 ms, and eight after 150 ms post-stimulus. Source estimates showed complex spatial differences between the classes in the cortical spreading of the TMS-evoked activity. ConclusionsTMS-evoked effective connectivity appears to depend on the phase of local cortical oscillations at the stimulated site. This may be crucial for efficient design of future brain-state-dependent and closed-loop stimulation paradigms.
- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 0.53
- Field percentile
- top 41%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- State dependent motor cortex stimulation reveals distinct mechanisms for corticospinal excitability and cortical responses
Nipun D. Perera, Miles Wischnewski, … Alexander Opitz·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2024
- The spatiotemporal evolution of TMS-evoked potentials reflects direct cortical activation
Matteo Fecchio, Simone Russo, … Mario Rosanova·bioRxiv·Jun 25, 2025
- Predictive modeling of TMS-evoked responses: Unraveling instantaneous excitability states
Oskari Ahola, Lisa Haxel, … Ulf Ziemann·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Oct 31, 2025
- Does Pre-Sensorimotor Brain Activity Modulate TMS-Evoked Potentials?
Motahare Delbari, Christoph Siegfried Herrmann, … Stefan Debener·bioRxiv·Sep 15, 2026
- Frequency- and area-specific entrainment of intrinsic cortical oscillations by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Yuka O. Okazaki, Yumi Nakagawa, … Keiichi Kitajo·bioRxiv·Oct 29, 2018
- Not Just Noise: Aperiodic Brain Activity Reflects Corticospinal Excitability
Juliana Hougland, Miriam Kirchhoff, … Ulf Ziemann·bioRxiv·May 5, 2026