PLoS Computational BiologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Realistic retinal modeling unravels the differential role of excitation and inhibition to starburst amacrine cells in direction selectivity
Elishai Ezra TsuriD, Oren AmsalemiD, Lea AnkriiD, Pritish PatiliD, Idan SegeviD, Michal Rivlin‐EtzioniD
Abstract
Retinal direction-selectivity originates in starburst amacrine cells (SACs), which display a centrifugal preference, responding with greater depolarization to a stimulus expanding from soma to dendrites than to a collapsing stimulus. Various mechanisms were hypothesized to underlie SAC centrifugal preference, but dissociating them is experimentally challenging and the mechanisms remain debatable. To address this issue, we developed the Retinal Stimulation Modeling Environment (RSME), a multifaceted data-driven retinal model that encompasses detailed neuronal morphology and biophysical properties, retina-tailored connectivity scheme and visual input. Using a genetic algorithm, we demonstrated that spatiotemporally diverse excitatory inputs - sustained in the proximal and transient in the distal processes - are sufficient to generate experimentally validated centrifugal preference in a single SAC. Reversing these input kinetics did not produce any centrifugal-preferring SAC. We then explored the contribution of SAC-SAC inhibitory connections in establishing the centrifugal preference. SAC inhibitory network enhanced the centrifugal preference, but failed to generate it in its absence. Embedding a direction selective ganglion cell (DSGC) in a SAC network showed that the known SAC-DSGC asymmetric connectivity by itself produces direction selectivity. Still, this selectivity is sharpened in a centrifugal-preferring SAC network. Finally, we use RSME to demonstrate the contribution of SAC-SAC inhibitory connections in mediating direction selectivity and recapitulate recent experimental findings. Thus, using RSME, we obtained a comprehensive mechanistic understanding of SACs centrifugal preference and its contribution to direction selectivity.
- Citations
- 13
- FWCI
- 1.18
- Field percentile
- top 24%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Antagonistic center-surround mechanisms for direction selectivity in the retina
Lea Ankri, Elishai Ezra Tsur, … Michal Rivlin‐Etzion·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2020
- Heterogeneous presynaptic receptive fields contribute to directional tuning in starburst amacrine cells.
John A. Gaynes, Samuel Alexander Budoff, … Alon Poleg-Polsky·bioRxiv·Aug 2, 2023
- Retinal direction selectivity in the absence of asymmetric starburst amacrine cell responses
Laura Hanson, Santhosh Sethuramanujam, … Gautam Bhagwan Awatramani·eLifePeer-reviewed·Feb 4, 2019
- Spatiotemporal properties of glutamate input support direction selectivity in the dendrites of retinal starburst amacrine cells
Prerna Srivastava, Geoff deRosenroll, … Gautam Bhagwan Awatramani·eLifePeer-reviewed·Nov 8, 2022
- Conserved Circuits for Direction Selectivity in the Primate Retina
Sara S. Patterson, Briyana N. Bembry, … Jay Neitz A·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 18, 2022
- Gain control by sparse, ultra-slow glycinergic synapses
Varsha Jain, Laura Hanson, … Gautam Bhagwan Awatramani·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2022