Mutation timing, accumulation and selection in the male germline shape inheritance risk for developmental disorders
Matthew D. C. NevilleiD, Sonja NeuseriD, Rashesh SanghviiD, Joseph ChristopheriD, Kirsty Roberts, Katie SmithiD, Laura O’Neill, Joseph Hayes, Alex CaganiD, Matthew E. HurlesiD, Anne GorielyiD, Rami Abou JamraiD, Raheleh RahbariiD
Abstract
De novo mutations (DNMs) arising in the parental germline are a major cause of severe developmental disorders. While most DNMs originate in the paternal germline, it remains unclear whether fathers of affected children carry a systematically altered burden of transmissible germline risk, or whether disease largely reflects stochastic outcomes of shared population-wide mutational processes. Here, we combined whole-genome sequencing of 168 parent-child trios with ultra-accurate duplex sequencing of paternal sperm to directly relate transmitted DNMs to the broader mutational and selective landscape of the male germline. In 127 fathers, sperm mutation burden and mutational spectra were indistinguishable from population reference cohorts. Positive selection metrics were likewise concordant, with a global dN/dS of 1.56 (95% CI 1.45-1.67) compared to 1.44 (95% CI 1.17-1.77) in controls and 28 of 32 significantly selected genes overlapping with prior findings. Six fathers harboured a pathogenic early mosaic variant detectable in sperm at allele fractions that ranged from 0.7% to 14.8%. Although these variants generated substantial individual-level risk outliers, they accounted for only [~]11% of the aggregated exome pathogenic burden across the cohort. The remaining burden was distributed across low-VAF mutations, including positively selected driver variants and other rare mutations accumulating with paternal age. Together, these results show that transmissible de novo disease risk is governed primarily by universal germline mutational and selective processes, while early developmental mosaicism produces uncommon but clinically meaningful deviations. This integrated view clarifies how mutation timing, age-associated accumulation and germline selection jointly shape inheritance risk.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- top 31%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Sperm sequencing reveals extensive positive selection in the male germline
Matthew D. C. Neville, Andrew R. J. Lawson, … Raheleh Rahbari·NaturePeer-reviewed·Oct 8, 2025
- Heritability of de novo germline mutation reveals a contribution from paternal but not maternal genetic factors
Seongwon Hwang, Matthew D. C. Neville, … Aylwyn Scally·bioRxiv·Dec 17, 2022
- Genetic and chemotherapeutic causes of germline hypermutation
Joanna Kaplanis, Benjamin Ide, … Matthew E. Hurles·NaturePeer-reviewed·May 11, 2022
- Temporal stability of human sperm mosaic mutations results in life-long threat of transmission to offspring
Xiaoxu Yang, Martin W. Breuss, … Joseph G. Gleeson·CellPeer-reviewed·Aug 12, 2021
- Paternal-age-related de novo mutations and risk for five disorders
Jacob L. Taylor, Jean-Christophe Debost, … Elise Robinson·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jul 10, 2019
- Activating mutations in FGFR3 are associated with clonal expansion events and high de novo rates in the male germline
Sofia Moura, Ingrid Hartl, … Irene Tiemann‐Boege·bioRxiv·Jul 31, 2022