Formal axioms in biomedical ontologies improve analysis and interpretation of associated data
Abstract
MotivationThere are now over 500 ontologies in the life sciences. Over the past years, significant resources have been invested into formalizing these biomedical ontologies. Formal axioms in ontologies have been developed and used to detect and ensure ontology consistency, find unsatisfiable classes, improve interoperability, guide ontology extension through the application of axiom-based design patterns, and encode domain background knowledge. At the same time, ontologies have extended their amount of human-readable information such as labels and definitions as well as other meta-data. As a consequence, biomedical ontologies now form large formalized domain knowledge bases and have a potential to improve ontology-based data analysis by providing background knowledge and relations between biological entities that are not otherwise connected. ResultsWe evaluate the contribution of formal axioms and ontology meta-data to the ontology-based prediction of protein-protein interactions and gene-disease associations. We find that the formal axioms that have been created for the Gene Ontology and several other ontologies significantly improve ontology-based prediction models through provision of domain-specific background knowledge. Furthermore, we find that the labels, synonyms and definitions in ontologies can also provide background knowledge that may be exploited for prediction. The axioms and meta-data of different ontologies contribute in varying degrees to improving data analysis. Our results have major implications on the further development of formal knowledge bases and ontologies in the life sciences, in particular as machine learning methods are more frequently being applied. Our findings clearly motivate the need for further development, and the systematic, application-driven evaluation and improvement, of formal axioms in ontologies. Availabilityhttps://github.com/bio-ontology-research-group/tsoe Contactrobert.hoehndorf@kaust.edu.sa, xin.gao@kaust.edu.sa
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 23
- FWCI
- 1.32
- Field percentile
- top 20%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Self-normalizing learning on biomedical ontologies using a deep Siamese neural network
Fatima Zohra Smaili, Xin Gao, Robert Hoehndorf·bioRxiv·Apr 23, 2020
- Ontology pre-training improves machine learning-based predictions for metabolites
Charlotte Tumescheit, Martin Glauer, … Janna Hastings·bioRxiv·Sep 30, 2025
- Machine learning with biomedical ontologies
Maxat Kulmanov, Fatima Zohra Smaili, … Robert Hoehndorf·bioRxiv·May 7, 2020
- DeepGOZero: Improving protein function prediction from sequence and zero-shot learning based on ontology axioms
Maxat Kulmanov, Robert Hoehndorf·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 14, 2022
- DeepGO-SE: Protein function prediction as Approximate Semantic Entailment
Maxat Kulmanov, Francisco J. Guzmán‐Vega, … Robert Hoehndorf·bioRxiv·Sep 26, 2023
- Towards semantic interoperability: finding and repairing hidden contradictions in biomedical ontologies
Luke T. Slater, Georgios V. Gkoutos, Robert Hoehndorf·BMC Medical Informatics and Decision MakingPeer-reviewed·Dec 15, 2020