bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
SOUND LOCALIZATION IS BIASED BY SIMULTANEOUS AND DELAYED BY PRECEDING VISUAL DISTRACTORS
Francesca RocchiiD, Nina C. HaukesiD, A. John Van OpstaliD, Marc M. van WanrooijiD
Abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWVision can shape auditory perception, especially when visual cues occur at different times and locations than sounds. Simultaneous but spatially misaligned lights bias the perceived location of a sound--a phenomenon known as the ventriloquism effect. Temporally misaligned lights can also affect the latency of auditory responses. However, it remains unclear how multiple visual stimuli that differ from sounds in both space and time jointly influence localization behaviour. We investigated how visual distractors, spatially misaligned by 10{degrees}, presented before and/or during a target sound influence localization accuracy and response latency in a rapid head-pointing task. Human listeners localized brief (150 ms) broadband noise bursts with an average root-mean-square error of 5{degrees} and a baseline latency of 252 ms. Simultaneous visual cues induced the ventriloquism effect, in which the perceived sound location was biased by 1.8{degrees}. Response latency also increased by 21 ms (273 ms). Preceding visual stimuli (2 s duration) did not induce a bias, but increased latency by 55 ms (307 ms). Introducing a 200 ms gap between the preceding light and the sound reduced this latency increase to 24 ms (276 ms), still not inducing a significant bias. When we presented both a preceding and a simultaneous light on opposite sides of the sound, localization reflected the bias induced by the simultaneous light (1.8{degrees}) and the latency increase induced by the preceding light (by 48 ms). These findings reveal a dissociation in audiovisual integration: preceding visual stimuli primarily influence when a sound is responded to (latency), while simultaneous stimuli influence where it is perceived (accuracy). This supports causal inference models of multisensory integration and suggests distinct underlying mechanisms for spatial and temporal processing of sounds in sensorimotor circuits.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Both stimulus-specific and configurational features of multiple visual stimuli shape the spatial ventriloquism effect
Christoph Kayser, Nienke B. Debats, Herbert Heuer·European Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 17, 2024
- Re-weighting of Sound Localization Cues by Audiovisual Training
Daniel Paul Kumpik, Connor Campbell, … Andrew J. King·Frontiers in NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 15, 2019
- Visual landmarks calibrate auditory space across eye movements
David Aagten‐Murphy, Martin Szinte, … Heiner Deubel·bioRxiv·Nov 25, 2019
- Broad generalisation of the ventriloquism aftereffect across sound frequencies
Rachel Ege, Nina C. Haukes, … Marc M. van Wanrooij·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Mar 7, 2026
- Invisible flashes bias spatial coding in the auditory system
Patrycja Delong, Claire Plèche, Uta Noppeney·bioRxiv·Feb 12, 2026
- Perceived multisensory common cause relations shape the ventriloquism effect but only marginally the trial-wise aftereffect
Christoph Kayser, Herbert Heuer·European Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2025