Scientific DataGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Improvement of eukaryotic proteins prediction from soil metagenomes
Carole BelliardoiD, Georgios KoutsovoulosiD, Corinne RancureliD, Mathilde Clément, Justine Lipuma, Marc Bailly‐BechetiD, Étienne DanchiniD
Abstract
BackgroundDuring the last decades, shotgun metagenomics and metabarcoding have highlighted the diversity of microorganisms from environmental or host-associated samples. Most assembled metagenome public repositories use annotation pipelines tailored for prokaryotes regardless of the taxonomic origin of contigs and metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). Consequently, eukaryotic contigs and MAGs, with intrinsically different gene features, are not optimally annotated, resulting in an incorrect representation of the eukaryotic component of biodiversity, despite their biological relevance. ResultsUsing an automated analysis pipeline, we have filtered 7.9 billion of contigs from 6,873 soil metagenomes in the IMG/M database of the Joint Genome Institute to identify eukaryotic contigs. We have re-annotated genes using eukaryote-tailored methods, yielding 8 million eukaryotic proteins. Of these, 5.6 million could be traced back to non-chimeric higher confidence eukaryotic contigs. Our pipeline improves eukaryotic proteins completeness, contiguity and quality. Moreover, the better quality of eukaryotic proteins combined with a more comprehensive assignment method improves the taxonomic annotation as well. ConclusionsUsing public soil metagenomic data, we provide a dataset of eukaryotic soil proteins with improved completeness and quality as well as a more reliable taxonomic annotation. This unique resource is of interest for any scientist aiming at studying the composition, biological functions and gene flux in soil communities involving eukaryotes. O_TEXTBOXKey Points O_LIEukaryotic micro-organisms have key roles in soil microbial communities and ecosystems. C_LIO_LIEukaryotic genes and proteins are incorrectly represented in metagenomic libraries due to inappropriate methods dedicated to prokaryotes. C_LIO_LIWe have improved the quality and completeness of the de novo proteins prediction and taxonomic annotation of eukaryotic organisms from soil or plant-associated microbiome. C_LI C_TEXTBOX
- Citations
- 14
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- MetaEuk - sensitive, high-throughput gene discovery and annotation for large-scale eukaryotic metagenomics
Eli Levy Karin, Milot Mirdita, Johannes Söding·MicrobiomePeer-reviewed·Apr 3, 2020
- Contigs directed gene annotation (ConDiGA) for accurate protein sequence database construction in metaproteomics
Enhui Wu, Vijini Mallawaarachchi, … Liang Qiao·MicrobiomePeer-reviewed·Mar 19, 2024
- Missing microbial eukaryotes and misleading meta-omic conclusions
A. I. Krinos, M. Mars Brisbin, … H. Alexander·bioRxiv·Jul 30, 2023
- The high-throughput gene prediction of more than 1,700 eukaryote genomes using the software package EukMetaSanity
Christopher J. Neely, Sarah K. Hu, … Benjamin Tully·bioRxiv·Jul 25, 2021
- aweMAGs: a fully automated workflow for quality assessment and annotation of eukaryotic genomes from metagenomes
Davide Albanese, Claudia Coleine, … Claudio Donati·bioRxiv·Feb 8, 2023
- Uncovering hidden members and functions of the soil microbiome using de novo metaproteomics
Joon‐Yong Lee, Hugh D. Mitchell, … Samuel Payne·Journal of Proteome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jul 6, 2022