Is most published research really false?
Abstract
There has been an increasing concern that most published medical findings are false. But what does it mean to be false? Here we describe the range of definitions of false discoveries in the scientific literature. We summarize the philosophical, statistical, and experimental evidence for each type of false discovery. We discuss common underpinning problems with the scientific and data analytic practices and point to tools and behaviors that can be implemented to reduce the problems with published scientific results.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The Reproducibility Of Research And The Misinterpretation Of P Values
D. Colquhoun·bioRxiv·Oct 25, 2017
- How Changes in Common Practice Can Improve the Quality of Biomedical Science
M. Steinfath, S. Vogl, … G. Schoenfelder·bioRxiv·Nov 13, 2017
- Issues in the statistical detection of data fabrication and data errors in the scientific literature: simulation study and reanalysis of Carlisle, 2017
Scott W. Piraino·bioRxiv·Aug 22, 2017
- Modeling Science Trustworthiness Under Publish Or Perish Pressure
D. R. Grimes, C. T. Bauch, J. P. A. Ioannidis·bioRxiv·May 17, 2017
- The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications
Elisabeth M Bik, Arturo Casadevall, Ferric C Fang·bioRxiv·May 17, 2016
- Is biomedical research self-correcting? Modelling insights on the persistence of spurious science
D. R. Grimes·bioRxiv·Jul 17, 2023